Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/11/2015 in all areas

  1. 2 points
  2. Varun_Utd

    individual players

    Why the hell did Pogba get a plus 1? Ditto for Veratii. Just because they are fancy big name players?
    2 points
  3. There are lots of people complaining about the new interface but to be honest it does look good,the problem is it seems to have been rushed and there are lots of problems,but that can be got over,what can't be is the way the economics of the game suddenly make managing small teams to success impossible due to high transfer values and wages and also the formation changes,you can't just decide that all of a sudden a 3 man defense has to consist only of CBs and that attacking midfielders can no longer play on wings when managers like myself have spent years building teams around these formations,
    2 points
  4. Well, since I can't find SuperNAG's thread, here this goes! I have a treat for all you lovely moochers out there. Guedes had a +3, which was measly. Should have been a +4 or even a +5. Neves has almost 400 minutes less than Guedes and he rose from 83 to 86 (should have been a +1, as he got the rise when he had less than 600 minutes of game time). Here are some risers, that I hope SW doesn't overlook (all deserve at least a +4): Douglas Dyanfres (on loan at Sanfrecce Hiroshima) - 78 -> 83 Fabinho Aguiar (Yokohama F Marinos) - 78 -> 83 Carlos Eduardo (Kashiwa Reysol) - 78 ->
    1 point
  5. Halilovic absolutely deserves a +2 he's been sensational for Sporting. stats? who cares about stats! they're a tiny club and he has them playing genuinely good football and competing. Neymar +1 Suárez +1 Busquets +1 Piqué +1 (should have never dropped, and should have gotten it back after the Treble) Alba +1 Griezmann +1 Godin +1 (should have been 95 a couple years ago tbh) Gimenez +2 Koke +1 Saúl +1 Varane +1 (or a +2 just because he should already BE rated 92) Keylor +1 Nacho +1 Casemiro +1 Iñaki Williams +2 Lucas Perez +2 Agirretxe +1 are all essential rises for me.
    1 point
  6. why cant they just keep the option of choosing which interface to play with!!!!!
    1 point
  7. ...yeah...great idea, why don't they just create a 3-0-7 formation for you. Then you can hoard all of the world's best F(RCL)s and field seven of them in a starting 11 You see my point.
    1 point
  8. Because this (Soccer Manager Worlds) is a real life based managerial game. So you are not obliged to train your players, you are not able to play it as FIFA16 and you are not allowed to decide/improve player skills as real manager like real life needs. It's a real life based game and you can play so. You can decide transfers and tactics only = Soccer Manager (Worlds).
    1 point
  9. That is my point, just because you choose to play 3 @ the back doesn't mean they have to be CBs it is possible to play one CB and two fullbacks instead. And how is playing AMs abuse of 352? It's merely playing an attacking version of the formation,something many of us have done for years and now we are expected to just change it all overnight! There are different versions of formations, if they just bring in a 352 attack it could solve this problem. As for fullbacks in midfield, if I wanted defensive players in that position I wouldn't have had AMs there would I. I notice you didn't pick fault
    1 point
  10. Really losing interest in my teams because of these over the top uupdates. Not fond of the financial changes made to players and player wages, don't like the fact my 4-3-3 formation that I have been using for like ten years has been changed so few of my players are being said to be slightly out of position with the yellow. The transfer prices of players doesn't make sense anymore how are you pricing players now. I think it's a awful change that has happen I may just be playing with around four teams soon instead of the fourteen I have been.
    1 point
  11. Full backs doesn't play as CB in real life, and AM abuse in 5-men mid is over. You can now play full backs as middies in your 3-5-2, don't you?
    1 point
  12. You could change game. SM is a game sure, but going on this logic we could see FW playing as CB or other position.
    1 point
  13. Both Coman and Robben played as M (R or L) one time only this season and you want to add them M position. You are saying this. I'm saying one game (or few games) is not enough to change position to players. Remember: midfielder Kwadwo Asamoah of Juventus FC needed 1 whole season + another half playing as D(L) to reach this position on SW/SM attributes. So you have to do this work: are Coman and Robben playing as wide Middies by so far to justify a position add? Answer is NOT. Easy.
    1 point
  14. All your complains is about AM(CLR), and if they can or can't play in M(CLR) spot. But what about real M and DM's?? Cazorla for example don't deserve a DM? Dzagoev the same(DM). Luiz Gustavo still has D(CL) (this season has never play in that spot) Kampl play in Leverkusen and as DM. The same Max Arnold in Wolfsburg Moussa Dempele in Spurs. He play in DM and AM® position also Bonaventura he can play all the left winger spot M-AM-F(L) in Milan Less recognised players also have rights How in hell is possible Sergi Roberto and Jonathan Schmid to play as CB in 352 just because they have D® ????
    1 point
  15. If you want reliable source of players position use espn gamecast, especially for this game: http://www.espnfc.us/gamecast/427023/gamecast.html Just click TACTICAL FORMATION and then Average Position and you'll see that Koman played as pure AML, no way near to ML. And as a manager used in 30+ clubs 3-5-2 wasn't so hard going to another formation in all of my clubs except one! So stop bargain for player position which will suit your team but find new tactics for your players.
    1 point
  16. Full backs are FULL BACKS! They are not CB...they never should have been able to play in a back three in the first place. You think you are special and unique because you use the 3-5-2? WRONG! Almost everyone abuses this formation...it is ridiculously overpowered. ...I see the changes as primarily driven by the widespread abuse of AMs and wingers. The flat midfield (M) in a 4-4-2, 3-5-2 etc. is NOT the same at the AM positions in a 4-2-3-1. For this reason, AMs with NO M(RCL) abilities should NOT be able to play this deep. In the past, many managers have mindlessly hoarded all the high
    1 point
  17. Cheers, mate! Unfortunately I reckon the forums have been dying way before the hacking. There was a massive exodus since the original forum layout was changed. :/
    1 point
  18. @SM Devs and Admins - Do you realise that with the economy changes you are asking people that have spent years, (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc) building their teams to start all over again? Do you realise that smaller clubs have no way to make money nor do they have an opportunity to compete? There were tens of very detailed posts showing you how bad these changes are for a lot of gameworlds however you have deleted them because people have venteed their full frustration and anger in them which has derived from the very unwelcome changes you have implemented. Do you want to purposely lose customers? Tel
    1 point
  19. I'm slowly getting used to the new layout... I'm sure in time it will become second nature to navigate... Just a few things that stick out, I tend to use mobile rather than desktop. The 'Overview' and 'Home' should all be the one screen, it's more clicks to get to the information you want... I.e. transfer info There is no need for the box containing the gw I'd and asking friends to join, space is at a premium on mobiles and things like this just clog things up! Same goes for the 'scout' why anyone would even use this let alone pay for it I don't know... Again, taking up valuable space...
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...