Jump to content

argala

Members
  • Content Count

    1,666
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

argala last won the day on June 19 2012

argala had the most liked content!

About argala

  • Rank
    Globetrotter User
  1. Re: Current Multiplayer Problems & Solutions Of course you agree! There're some people (like us admins) doing for you a free job, improving your game with updated infos. SM Database is RIDICOULOUSLY up to date, and is going worse! can you realize it?? Now, Steven, for God sake: assuming that you've some people working on SM codes, there are two options. A) You never warned them about this 20 players message: in this case, as you repeatedly claim you did and they're going to fix it, you lied to us, who aren't only your clients (I'm gold manager since like forever).. We're also your voulonteer manpower. You warned them, and they couldn't solve a freaking banal limitation which is active for like 20 users (just wondering, I don't know how many admins are left, but really few of us). In the first case, you're a barker. In the second case, you're telling us: "I don't have the capacity of supervise my own employees in order to make fix something which takes 5 minutes to get fixed." What are you trying to tell us? Thanks
  2. Re: Current Multiplayer Problems & Solutions As I said some months ago, I was fed up with this, and I decreased my activity in SW...A couple of WEEKS ago I had to add a bunch of players, and I'm glad to see that NOTHING changes since the last year.. Still facing the same freaking 20 players message. Obviously, SW devs claims that they're going to fix something in SW were hot air... Congratulations guys, keep the good work on (Ironic)
  3. Re: Current Multiplayer Problems & Solutions 27 days and counting since I added the last player, and still this message, every day. 87 days and counting since I added the last referee, and still have this message. We have a ridicously patchy database, Steven, wake up and change something there. AND STOP GIVING US STOCK ANSWERS, it's even more annoying than being ignored. Note well: I edited at least a couple of times this post as was pretty ruder.
  4. Re: The New Players Thread It doesn't matter where they have played. I didn't add them' date=' but I just checked it out, and apart ORSOLIC (who's not croatian, by the way) and DUKA (who got 9 benches this year, and looks like the 2nd GK in his club) they all already played professional matches so they are eligible to be added. Which ones?
  5. Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed
  6. Re: Current Multiplayer Problems & Solutions Always people complaining about slowliness of SW, and the few admins left have to face this message every freaking time. We're fed up with this. Seriously. Remove it NOW.
  7. Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed
  8. Re: Riferimento: Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed
  9. Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed And yeah, we don't have any power on ratings.
  10. Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed I can clarify this copying/pasting an old message by SW Mark (not in charge anymore). Hi Argala' date=' All edits made by people are passed onto this page for further approval. At the moment it's you and JMH who have access to this page. The idea is that the most trusted people have access to this page and can stop dodgy entries going through. All you have to do is press accept if you think the entry is correct and reject it if you think it's not. There is a suspend button but only press that if the user is trying to put himself into the wiki or the edit is malicious. You also have the power to request a suspension by searching users and pressing the suspend button. If you need any more help or you find a bug with the page then let me know. Regards, Mark [/i'] This message is dated Sept, 2013, and I guess nothing changed since then.
  11. Re: Riferimento: Re: Riferimento: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed
  12. Re: Riferimento: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed No effects. Tickets need only be voted by just one SW admin' date=' and it went directly to "unknown board". (i don't know who is in charge there, so I'll use your definition) No effects. You cannot see anywhere how many users have an account there, so you wouldn't damage the "reputation" of the website, and nobody would notice that. Also no effects. You'll get a BOT reply
  13. Re: The New Players Thread The rule was 450 minutes and it was before soccerwiki creation (when you used to add players directly in-game). Since the beginning of SW, there is not any guideline about that, although the "unwritten" rule is accepting only players with at least 1 minute played in an official game...
  14. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom(Match Reports,Transfer News,Discussion,and Slagging!)
  15. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom(Match Reports,Transfer News,Discussion,and Slagging!)
×
×
  • Create New...