Jump to content

argala

Members
  • Content Count

    1,666
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by argala

  1. Re: Current Multiplayer Problems & Solutions Of course you agree! There're some people (like us admins) doing for you a free job, improving your game with updated infos. SM Database is RIDICOULOUSLY up to date, and is going worse! can you realize it?? Now, Steven, for God sake: assuming that you've some people working on SM codes, there are two options. A) You never warned them about this 20 players message: in this case, as you repeatedly claim you did and they're going to fix it, you lied to us, who aren't only your clients (I'm gold manager since like forever).. We're also your voulonteer manpower. You warned them, and they couldn't solve a freaking banal limitation which is active for like 20 users (just wondering, I don't know how many admins are left, but really few of us). In the first case, you're a barker. In the second case, you're telling us: "I don't have the capacity of supervise my own employees in order to make fix something which takes 5 minutes to get fixed." What are you trying to tell us? Thanks
  2. Re: Current Multiplayer Problems & Solutions As I said some months ago, I was fed up with this, and I decreased my activity in SW...A couple of WEEKS ago I had to add a bunch of players, and I'm glad to see that NOTHING changes since the last year.. Still facing the same freaking 20 players message. Obviously, SW devs claims that they're going to fix something in SW were hot air... Congratulations guys, keep the good work on (Ironic)
  3. Re: Current Multiplayer Problems & Solutions 27 days and counting since I added the last player, and still this message, every day. 87 days and counting since I added the last referee, and still have this message. We have a ridicously patchy database, Steven, wake up and change something there. AND STOP GIVING US STOCK ANSWERS, it's even more annoying than being ignored. Note well: I edited at least a couple of times this post as was pretty ruder.
  4. Re: The New Players Thread It doesn't matter where they have played. I didn't add them' date=' but I just checked it out, and apart ORSOLIC (who's not croatian, by the way) and DUKA (who got 9 benches this year, and looks like the 2nd GK in his club) they all already played professional matches so they are eligible to be added. Which ones?
  5. Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed
  6. Re: Current Multiplayer Problems & Solutions Always people complaining about slowliness of SW, and the few admins left have to face this message every freaking time. We're fed up with this. Seriously. Remove it NOW.
  7. Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed
  8. Re: Riferimento: Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed
  9. Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed And yeah, we don't have any power on ratings.
  10. Re: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed I can clarify this copying/pasting an old message by SW Mark (not in charge anymore). Hi Argala' date=' All edits made by people are passed onto this page for further approval. At the moment it's you and JMH who have access to this page. The idea is that the most trusted people have access to this page and can stop dodgy entries going through. All you have to do is press accept if you think the entry is correct and reject it if you think it's not. There is a suspend button but only press that if the user is trying to put himself into the wiki or the edit is malicious. You also have the power to request a suspension by searching users and pressing the suspend button. If you need any more help or you find a bug with the page then let me know. Regards, Mark [/i'] This message is dated Sept, 2013, and I guess nothing changed since then.
  11. Re: Riferimento: Re: Riferimento: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed
  12. Re: Riferimento: Vast improvement of Soccerwiki needed No effects. Tickets need only be voted by just one SW admin' date=' and it went directly to "unknown board". (i don't know who is in charge there, so I'll use your definition) No effects. You cannot see anywhere how many users have an account there, so you wouldn't damage the "reputation" of the website, and nobody would notice that. Also no effects. You'll get a BOT reply
  13. Re: The New Players Thread The rule was 450 minutes and it was before soccerwiki creation (when you used to add players directly in-game). Since the beginning of SW, there is not any guideline about that, although the "unwritten" rule is accepting only players with at least 1 minute played in an official game...
  14. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom(Match Reports,Transfer News,Discussion,and Slagging!)
  15. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom(Match Reports,Transfer News,Discussion,and Slagging!)
  16. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom(Match Reports,Transfer News,Discussion,and Slagging!) Vita is pure talent, probably the best of the bunch... But I missed Trainotti (decent) and Cristini (pretty good, outbidded)..I guess you messed it up though, as Reggina and ReggiAna aren't the same team.. I got this challenge as several clubs of Lega pro are really underrated... I cannot give you any advice for italians them.. But there're some foreigners who are worthy to be picked up
  17. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom(Match Reports,Transfer News,Discussion,and Slagging!) Which one? So sorry about that I made a 100% italian side, and actually I missed a couple of my targets..
  18. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom(Match Reports,Transfer News,Discussion,and Slagging!) Yeah, i's about to say that... If someone is breaking rules so deliberately , I highly doubt he will follow punishment we are planning here. It's maybe harsh, but according to my experience, the only efficacious method with cheaters here is stalking and harassing them (please avoiding menaces with penal consequences though ) . Everybody should PM and blame them for their attitude.. If they block chat and PMs going to other GWs where he uses to play and telling everybody he's a cheater, has really good payback...
  19. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom(Match Reports,Transfer News,Discussion,and Slagging!) It's funny because when I saw the chosen teams, I was like: "Well, i'm not the weakest side, there's Halifax with the same ratings".. Two days after, they broke the only rule you can break... And what's he first match we have to play? Vs Halifax, LOL...
  20. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom! Sorry, GW id?? got it, please accept me there
  21. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom! dario barini (gold)
  22. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom! Well, it's from the Commonwealth, but fair enough How much money will we have at the beginning? I'll pick up Sutton United though
  23. Re: It's Tough At The Bottom! I enjoyed pretty much the old GW, is there any limitation for picking up another club, not english one? I'd love to get the new Lincoln Red, the Gibraltar one.. let me know mate
  24. Re: PORTUGAL – 1st and 2nd Division extensive thread - Discussion Thread Will Kritsyuk be the GK of the Braga during this season?
×
×
  • Create New...