Jump to content

Meis

Members
  • Posts

    1,158
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Meis

  1. All of these changes were explained before hand...pay attention. Sergio Aguero should not be playing CM...and if you played him in CM, you are a frontrunner. Lahm is fine in my set up, maybe change your formation?

     

    Too much complaining...I find that odd since everyonne wanted an engine update.

    It's not a complain. Just shedding some light.  :)

  2. It looks too fancy to the degree I can't get similar with it. You moved the things around too much.  :(

     

    Anyhow, I noticed these changes:

     

    On the tactics page -

    - No tight marking option
    - No counter attacks option
    - No offside trap option
    - No target man option
    - Force to set "on" the playmaker option. I just hope the AI or any noobs do not set the playmaker to a CB.
     
    It makes me wonder if it was useless after all in the previous game engine... especially tight marking and counter attacks options.
     
    Regarding the players -
    - LR defenders can no longer play on 3 CB formations.
    - CAM player can no longer play as CM LOLWUT? For example: SERGIO AGÜERO.
    - There are so many quality (94 rating) CAM players (who happened to be able to play on all 6 forward positions) on SM database.
    - But the left/right AM can still play as LM or RM... meh
    - Phillip Lahm  can no longer play on any (normal) midfield positions. It has to be only LRC DM positions. CM can still being play on CDM. Phew...
    - Removed the "field position" on the players' profile. You wanted to save space but you ended up removing something important and convenience. Bad change.
    - Changed the statistic things. Subs are no longer being show on the players' profile. Number of subs can only be seen on the tactics page.
     
    UI/layouts -
    - The whole page is very compact (empty on both sides with some ads), more scrolling down. Eh?
  3. Re: Player concerns - toughen up the rules

    HAHAHA

    I quit this game for couple of years when the game was broken. Now I'm back, but not so 'high' with this game like last time.

    And this is what I get for returning

    Players hogging at its best.

    His first team, don't get me rap on his reserve:

    WGyzpsk.png

    YsnjmHB.png

    Note: This is the setup where I left off. Good to be back, but.....

    Player concerns? What's that? :D

    dPzvWb1.png

    SM you failed last time and you still fail!

    But who cares when you're making money, right? :D

    P.S. The manager had so much players, so much so, he ever overlooked M'VILA, Yann and AUGUSTO, Renato LOL

  4. Re: When Managers Don't Respond to Transfers

    Setting a player as unavailable would stop bids from coming in but that kills the transfer market as people rarely get in contact over unavailable players. A Minimum fee is an option but one I don't see a point in' date=' especially in high rated players. If I was to sell Robben I'd want a good p/e offer which might total £40m, If I was to set a £35m min fee it would still be pointless as I constantly get cash offers of £50m+ and cash is usless in 90% of setups.

    Another example,

    -Boca Juniors have made an offer to Manchester United for Cristiano RONALDO of £47,000,000 plus Lucas VIATRI and Cristian CELLAY

    That is the type of deal I have no intention of accepting or even responding too. I can get 10 or more offers like this a day, reject them and they come back with similarly poor offers.

    Set a minimum fee and I get this..

    Hamburger SV have made an offer to Manchester United for Cristiano RONALDO of £125,000,000

    With a bank balance myself of £80m and growing by each week I have no use for cash.

    [b']Ignore them and I get 2 weeks peace.[/b]

    Ditto!

    I can't see why SM need to change or prove the current system as it is just fine the way it is.

    If anything, please add an option to loaning, "can't play against the owner team or cup match".

×
×
  • Create New...