Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by xDave

  1. Re: What improvements / new features would you like?

    1. Like many others have said, statistics make this sort of thing far more interesting. Specifically the players; cup stats should be recorded as well as league stats, and there should definitely be player award histories on their profiles. This should also transfer over to the club history bit; we have highest transfer received, why not highest goal scorer? Highest rated? Most reds? Most assists? Etc. You record all these things, so it shouldn't be too hard to add them on to that bit.

    2. Player limits: It's just silly at the moment. People have like 300 players in some worlds, why? It's so unrealistic it's crazy, and I think that's the problem, realism. Exact realism is bad, but in instances like this there should definitely be an attempt to make it better. What club in the world has 300 players? It should be capped, I dunno at what. You could say 50-60ish (as you need a first team generally of 25-30 + a youth team. Some people completely dominate worlds, there's no point joining them as they have all the best players and allthe best youth.

    3. Inactive managers need to be dealt with. This causes so much trouble in smaller game worlds. They sign up, get given a team in a league that's starting soon and never sign in again. I understand that you want to try and get people active, but you're not paying enough attention to the people who are active here. Waiting 30 days for a manager to get kicked (+7 for their players to free up) only to have to wait another 30 days when a new manager joins is awful. The time limit for new managers getting kicked if they're inactive should be much, much shorter. Personally, I would put it at 7 days. But, of course, another person who will go inactive can then take the team over, so I'm not sure how you stop that.

    There are other things I'd like, such as more tactic options and a reserves tab for the squad, but these three I think are the most important (especially 2 and 3). I have a lot more things I'd like tbh! It'd be good to have more regular games in every league, then people would require a good squad not a good XI. Okay, I'll stop!

  2. Re: Another new design...

    All the posts that were deleted were deleted for being off topic. This thread isn't about cheating' date=' rating reviews or SM's poor customer service.

    Further off topic posts will also be removed.[/quote']

    I've posted (three times) saying that the new design doesn't work because the player pictures are poorly managed. This is related to the new design. I am talking about the new design. This topic is about the new design.

    All three of my posts about the new design have been deleted, along with several other people's posts about the new design; all of which have been about the new design, thus on topic. I don't see anyone in here talking about the weather, just about the new design, and yet you delete it all.

    But, let me guess: this is off-topic (i.e. disagrees with SM's views on the new design) and you're going to delete it. I've bolded all the times I've said "new design" so you can't accidentally think it's off-topic, I guess the mods have bad eyesight.

  3. Re: Coutinho vs Cleverly

    Do you know what a typo is? I bet you're seething whenever you read my messages' date='[/color'] :D

    Woah buddy, that's a lot of typos. And you only seem to "typo" the same errors, really strange! You've typoed again in your reply, so I've corrected it for you. No need to thank me, buddy, you're welcome!

  4. Re: Coutinho vs Cleverly

    Cleverley is incredibly average. If he was in another Premier League side, United wouldn't look at him once, let alone twice. He's shown lots of potential, but he's never actually built on that. It's not really possible to compare him to Coutinho though; they're completely different types of players.

    They go in knowing anything more than a draw is a very good result' date=' yes. Sir Alex Ferguson (see? I'm using capitals for the man's name, as it's plain rude not to) isn't going to sit there and go, "yeah, you know what? I'd take a point against a team that the whole fan base hates". He's going to say he wants to win.

    No, it doesn't mean they aim to lose and that's not a comparison at all. Some teams go to Manchester and their aim is to not get humiliated, so they just park the bus. United go to Anfield and, although they probably want the three points, they know a draw is more realistic than a win, which is a fact. Liverpool are always the favourites. I've waltzed into this thread and said Coutinho has a higher ceiling than Cleverley and that United don't tend to do well at Anfield, and this is coming from a guy that can't stand Liverpool.

    Corrected your English for you, buddy. Don't worry and just keep trying; you'll get there one day!

  5. Re: Suggestion for improvement: Stop trying to make this a social media site.

    a substantial amount of paying clients have concerns in which we would like addressed or' date=' at the very least, be considered via an open discussion with the developers.

    yet, your post is not only unhelpful to either party but actually harmful towards our aims of improving the game experience.

    i imagine being 'warned' is the least of your worries..[/color']

    I've been paying for about two years and SM have never taken any interest in what I've said; never even offered a medium to take an interest on for that matter.

  6. Re: New view of the website

    I am one of the voters for 2nd option' date=' in fact I'm growing to like this layout but still this is too white.[/quote']

    So you think it makes no difference, but you have a problem with it, and you also like it. Wut?

    Point is, it was fine before, why change it? They do this every few months now, it's just moronic.

  7. Re: New view of the website

    I don't get why you're all complaining! I think the new layout is brilliant!! Much much better then the last one! Both on the phone and on the PC!

    Looks like I'm one of the few people that actually likes the new layout of the site. I think it is a much more professional look than before and more modern looking. Everything is easy to find and I prefer having clubs displayed side by side as it means less scrolling is needed.

    Hey look, two more mods that like the design. Trolololol.

  8. Re: New view of the website

    I like the new slick look with white boxes and the grey background.
    regarding the layout' date=' it doesn't bother me either way. not got the feelings of revulsion that others have, but can't really see it as an improvement.[/quote']
    For me personaly new look of SM Game is nice' date=' much better then earlier.[/quote']
    By far the best layout yet! Please keep it for a prolonged period of time now SM!

    What a surprise' date=' the mods like the new layout [i']and[/i] are the only ones who do! Who would've guessed? :rolleyes: Gotta keep them coloured names, eh?

  9. Re: New view of the website

    I always loved how receptive Devs are when it comes to payment issues' date=' but when it come to this type of issues they are no where to be found ;)[/quote']

    Yep, it's brilliant, not that it tells us anything we don't know. That they don't trial designs or notify users is testament enough to the fact that they don't care about the users.

  10. Re: New view of the website

    I didn't realise it was a design change, I just thought I'd failed to load the website properly... It looks broken now, like half of it's missing. How hideous. They change this on a monthly basis and just make it worse and worse and worse. They're really trying the patience of their users, and it's running very thin for most people.

    Seems they've removed the post times from messages in the newsfeed? Why...?

  11. Re: Bundesliga Ratings Discussion

    SO Lewa is 94 but Muller still 93 :eek:

    It's crazy. Lewandowski started this season on 90. Sure, he's done well, but other players have done equally well and never seen such a huge jump. BVB didn't even win anything this season, and that's always been something people have assumed is important.

    I'm guessing Muller will rise, Bayern surely aren't done as Alaba is a 100% rise, so more must be coming. I'm expecting huge rating jumps from a lot of players now tbh. Bale 99 is on the cards.

  12. Re: Liga BBVA Ratings Predictions thread

    No' date=' that's not how the rating system should work![/quote']

    "rating system" and "work" shouldn't be in the same sentence, unless it also includes "doesn't".

    There doesn't seem to be any set requirement for a rating, it's just how they feel at the time. Lots of players aren't rated at all what they should be. I don't think 92 for Neymar is so bad, but it looks bad because so many other players have inaccurate ratings. The "anytime" rating schedule would theoretically stop this happening, but it hasn't seemed to.

  13. Re: Predictions for top clubs in top 4 countrires

    Manchester United

    VALENCIA...............92-91 40%

    CLEVERLEY..............89-90 75%

    ANDERSON..............89-88 30%

    NANI......................92-91 30%

    I'd say there's a much higher chance of Valencia dropping, and also Nani too. Anderson will maybe be spared because he's already so low rated, but I think he could maybe be 50-50. As for Cleverley rising, I dunno. He fell away towards the end of the season, I'd call him another 50-50.

  • Create New...