Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by l80mak

  1. Hi,I was wondering if anyone could help,I've been playing SM for nearly 10 years but I haven't reall got involved to much with forum or with SW since it was introduced but I want to get more involved with SW but I am only Level 2 and it doesn't seem to be budging, can anyone explain to me how to get my level up please?
  2. thankyou very much for the permission! But I think you'll find I'm struggling with nothing other than why SM choose to fix something that ain't broke.
  3. I think you'll find that if a player "might not play his best" is hardly likely to mean I think he is going to get a 9 rating,how about you stop being a pedantic little troll and step away from your screen and go learn something about real football,even a plank of wood if placed in the right spot could still put a ball over a line so of course someone out of position could still score or assist. Fact is we are all here to make our feelings clear to SM on the way the game has been changed,you don't like that tough! It strikes me one of the comments you got earlier was spot on about how you are
  4. if the formation was rigid then yes but that is the point I have been trying to make,why should it be rigid,you look on playing AMs as a loophole, you don't have loopholes to formations or rigid formations in real life just like a player who is forced to play out of position might not play at their best but that doesn't mean they can't score and as SM tries to be true to real life so why should there be loopholes? One of the good things about SM is that the formations were fluid just like in real life, if you want rigid pick a,b or c type of game then fine but the reason most of us are on SM i
  5. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and take it you are misunderstanding what I am saying, I know exactly what can and can't be done,I have coached football in real life,a 3 man defence does not have to consist of 3 CBs you can play with a LB,RB and a CB if you wish,this game is supposed to be based on real life so why shouldn't it be possible? Anyway as I said to your friend,I didn't come here to argue I came to make suggestions to help the game,if you don't like what I have to say tough,just butt out of my posts and I will stay out of yours!
  6. I think you'll find I already have been posting there. And if you actually look,I was making suggestions for the sake of SM, you two are the ones who have came in like know it alls, who are you to suggest how a formation is set out? Did I miss Sepp Blatter handing his torch over? I have played SM for 8 years and care about the game,I am not here to be ganged up on by a couple of keyboard gangsters who probably know nothing about real football beyond stats and figures. We'll just have to agree to disagree,but in future please do not butt in to my posts.
  7. you miss the point completely, I want to play AMs in midfield not forwards,I think you'll find that was the point this thread appeared to be making at the start,if players were given the right positions in first place then you wouldn't be able to play so many forwards,we simply want to be able to play more attacking MIDFIELDERS in midfield not forwards or players that play more defensively. But more to point it is about the way that this has been changed and now players that could play there can't,I'm sure you wouldn't be so pleased if it was done the other way round and it was changed so all
  8. I think you should read what I wrote again my friend, I do know what the game is,I have been playing for 8 years, currently have 34 teams and have won every competition at least once. Real life based means it should be based as much on real life as possible and if a manager chooses to play AMs in midfield instead of more defensive ones then he or she should be able to.
  9. Why shouldn't I as a manager be able to play 4 AMs and one DM in a 352 formation if I want to? It seems that there are some on here that are taking a tunnel vision view to the formations, fine if you want to play a 352 with flat midfielders then you should be able to,but at the same time those of us that want to play our style of formation should be allowed to as well,SM should be looking to make the game the best it can be for all,not just a minority that shout the loudest. The fact is if they introduced an attacking version of these formations (in particular 352) it would solve the arguments
  10. That is my point, just because you choose to play 3 @ the back doesn't mean they have to be CBs it is possible to play one CB and two fullbacks instead. And how is playing AMs abuse of 352? It's merely playing an attacking version of the formation,something many of us have done for years and now we are expected to just change it all overnight! There are different versions of formations, if they just bring in a 352 attack it could solve this problem. As for fullbacks in midfield, if I wanted defensive players in that position I wouldn't have had AMs there would I. I notice you didn't pick fault
  11. There are lots of people complaining about the new interface but to be honest it does look good,the problem is it seems to have been rushed and there are lots of problems,but that can be got over,what can't be is the way the economics of the game suddenly make managing small teams to success impossible due to high transfer values and wages and also the formation changes,you can't just decide that all of a sudden a 3 man defense has to consist only of CBs and that attacking midfielders can no longer play on wings when managers like myself have spent years building teams around these formations,
  12. Re: Jose Luis Hernandez/Marvin Loria I would say no,from checking full name of Loria on transfermarkt there don't seem to be any middle names that tie in with the other name as sometimes happens in the game plus from looking up pictures it appears they are 2 separate players, more likely that the one you are looking for hasn't been added yet. hope this helps
  13. Re: Liga BBVA Ratings Predictions thread How good can Jonny of Celta be?
  14. Re: The Fluffy Ligue 1 Ratings Thread How good is Fortuna Wallace?
  15. l80mak


    Re: MLS What do you guys think will happen with WONDOLOWSKI? he seems to have been on fire for last 3 years,surely he deserves a higher rating?
  16. Re: Argentinian risers I can't see anythin either
  17. l80mak


    Re: MLS What about Russell Teibert of Vancouver? he seems to have played in half the games at the age of 18,will he be in for rise? worth keeping?
  • Create New...