Jump to content

smut

Members
  • Posts

    4,145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

smut last won the day on September 14 2016

smut had the most liked content!

2 Followers

core_pfieldgroups_99

  • Location
    cape town
  • Favourite Football Club
    millwall
  • Participating In Following Setups
    EC7777, EC7046, Anno Domini 2, 4 Nations.

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Norfolk

Recent Profile Visitors

2,116 profile views
  1. It is hard to imagine any other company having such a lack of respect for it's customers than this one.
  2. No rush Chris/ Steven but if you ever log in again could you tell us what year you intend to make improvements?
  3. I have it written down but need to find time to sort it out on here.
  4. All they seem interested in is taking pocket money from their single player kids game and trying to get rich with some kind of crypto currency, a game that hasn't had positive views from established players of the multi game. They have already shown they aren't listening to customers from those they asked for views, all very sad, just wish they would sell the multi player game to someone who cares.
  5. You'll be lucky if chris or steve even look at the forum before Christmas next year.
  6. Chris started the thread and hasn't been on here since Oct. 18th and Steve wrote that comment and hasn't been back on since. Really does sum up the contempt they have for sm users. Way of the world nowdays, no pride in their work and can't be bothered with wasting time on customers.
  7. Hi Steven, Any chance that you will work on what the customers want instead? Any chance you will sort out the cheats and multi account problems soon? Any chance you can answer bug tickets? Any chance you can put right the problems the last lot of so called improvements caused?
  8. I think it might depend on whether their get rich quick game with crypto currency makes them wealthy or loses them money. the only comments I have seen are that the game is boring and can't see how anyone would put decent amounts of money into it. If they realise they need to earn a living from the multi player game then they might start to listen to their customers, otherwise their arrogance and lack of respect will just continue.
  9. I had said I would write a pm to Chris in a previous post but when I got the time to do so I noticed he was coming on here to respond, he now hasn't been on the forum since October 18th. I think that shows how much sm cares about it's customer, I'm glad I didn't waste my time in writing, they are all a waste of space, I just wish they would sell the multi player to someone who is capable of turning it into a good game to play. I have a Wed. & Thurs match not yet played and no message from sm, I wonder if they have noticed?
  10. The main problem is right here, Chris starts the topic and is our only direct way to talk to sm. He hasn't logged in for 12 days! sm have have basically ignored the discord group and are heading off in the same direction of the last lot of improvements by ignoring the basic foundation of the game and what it's customers want.
  11. Gil Vicente FC(C) 22 16 2 4 32 17 15 50 2 Bradford City(P) 22 12 6 4 46 31 15 42 3 Blackpool(P) 22 11 6 5 40 21 19 39 4 Dundee 22 11 6 5 31 18 13 39 5 Shorpe United 22 8 10 4 28 18 10 34 6 Plymouth Argyle 22 5 11 6 24 32 -8 26 7 ├ľstersunds FK(P) 22 6 7 9 26 25 1 25 8 Sparta Rotterdam 22 6 5 11 19 30 -11 23 9 Portimonense SC 22 5 7 10 21 33 -12 22 10 Denizlispor 22 4 6 12 21 33 -12 18 11 Tranmere Rovers 22 3 9 10 22 36 -14 18 12 Notts County 22 3 9 10 19 35 -16 18 Orient w whitby ru wrexham kilmarnock
  12. Whitby Town(C) 22 14 4 4 43 22 21 46 2 Heracles Almelo 22 11 4 7 29 22 7 37 3 Silkeborg IF 22 9 6 7 27 26 1 33 4 RKC Waalwijk 22 9 5 8 46 40 6 32 5 Clermont Foot 63 22 9 5 8 29 25 4 32 6 SPAL 22 8 6 8 17 22 -5 30 7 Wrexham 22 7 8 7 27 23 4 29 8 Kilmarnock 22 8 5 9 25 26 -1 29 9 MOTHERWELL(R) 22 5 10 7 22 21 1 25 10 Leyton Orient(R) 22 7 4 11 21 28 -7 25 11 Kasimpa┼ča SK(R) 22 6 7 9 19 27 -8 25 12 Barnet(R) 22 6 2 14 15 38 -23 20
  13. I think the ratings system has become past it's sell by date, they don't need to add frills to it but restart it in the same basic way. 60-99 is no longer useful, 10-99 would be of more help, the jump between 87 to 88 for example is one that can be argued about for a lot of players and I feel that at times an 87 and a half is needed, this is where extending the range would give a more realistic look.
  14. Chris will only be paid for certain hours so when he isn't working he won't be on the forum, having said that, you will find posts somewhere from 2016 from SM Dev's saying about their intention to improve things and what did we want to happen. Nothing ever happened and they soon stopped looking at the forum, same old SM, no respect at all for it's customers, so waiting a few days for replies is an improvement.
  15. One big problem about flexible ratings is that sm will implement them. You might like the sound of the idea but when it comes to how it works when you are playing the game it might ruin it. THey made a mess of the last attempt and we still have the problem of concerns which sm have constantly denied and ignored bug tickets ever since they made the changes.
×
×
  • Create New...