Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Valdivia

  • Rank
    New Signing!
  • Birthday 07/22/1984

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I agree, I posted couple of weeks back about how some Getafe players should have gone to 90 but the squad cap was holding them back, and there are plenty of examples of players who should be 90 or should rise beyond their squad cap. Seems like a lot are more annoyed with Grealish getting a 90 than others who deserve it not getting it, whereas it should be the other way round. I think with Grealish they should be applauded for getting it right for once.
  2. Grealish didn't deserve a 90 because he was Villa's best player, but because he is a 90 rated player in an 87 rated team. He carried them to such an extent that he should be an exception to any squad cap, and that's how it should be. I agree Digne at 91 is a bit much though.
  3. He scored a couple of very important goals but unfortunately showed no other sign of any of the skills required to be a winger. He is lucky to be as high as he is imo.
  4. Grealish easily deserves a 90, forget who he plays for, he is so far ahead of the rest of his team mates it's laughable. The fact he is 90 and the next best Villa player is 87 clearly reflects his situation within the team.
  5. Bit harsh to decrease Criscito I thought? Seems like a victim of his team having a poor season, but in reality he has been good and his goalscoring stats for a defender should have at least kept him at an 88, even if a lot have been penalties.
  6. Bit disappointed with the Getafe ratings, surely Etxieta should have got at least a +1, first teamer in 4th best defence in La Liga. And their cap should have risen to 90 as they finished ahead of Valencia and Athletic who have a higher cap and were challenging for Champions League spots before lockdown. Djene has been one of the best defenders in the league for the last couple of seasons now and should be 90, and Arambarri and Maksimovic should have gone to 90 too.
  7. Intima should get a nice rise just from his performance against Moreirense!
  8. It would help if the loan system was more flexible, especially for goalkeepers. I have a first team average of above 90 and yet cannot loan out players rated 88 or above despite their age. Surely a young player who is not near the standard of the first team would be happy to go out on loan to get playing time. But instead we are stuck with a system where the player is unhappy over a lack of games but can’t be loaned out. You should be able to loan out any under 90 players of a certain age (ie under 23). It’s even more ridiculous with goalkeepers as 88 and above rated expect to play so m
  9. Re: Player Concerns (please read the Online Help if looking for help) Who cares what would happen in real life, this is not real life, its a game. If it was like real life then we wouldn't play every sat-mon-wed, division 4 teams with money wouldn't be able 2 buy anyone they liked (including high rated division 1 concerned players - like that could really happen), but then the game would be rubbish. SM needs to readress the balance between fun and realism and remember what its about (trying 2 win trophies n developing youth players). Concerns make doing both of these almost impossible. If SM
  10. Re: Player Concerns (please read the Online Help if looking for help)
  11. Re: Player Concerns (please read the Online Help if looking for help) Rodriguez is 3rd in his position but his 3 ratings behind mata who is 2nd' date=' and is 3 ratings behind my average 1st 11. I also have more players of higher rating whos secondary position is winger. Therefore i cannot see how he can be good enough, and how this doesnt go against whats stated in the opening post. It would be bad enough if he wasnt getting minutes, but the fact he is makes it even more ridiculous! Thats fair enough, im only interested in established and rising stars or up and coming youngsters (like
  12. Re: Player Concerns (please read the Online Help if looking for help) It makes no sense to play him except in early cup games as keepers are always 100% and available' date=' and there isnt much demand 2 loan 89 keepers. Besides the last 89 player i loaned out got a loan concern anyway so theres not much point. But hes still 3 ratings lower than my 1st choice and a lot younger, i could understand it when he breaks into the 90s and is deemed world class on the game, but its still a bit harsh at the mo. Fair enough but if SM want to take realism to this extreme then it will take the fun
  13. Re: Player Concerns (please read the Online Help if looking for help) OK so sub appearances count as half, but even so its a bit over the top... If a player is featuring in every match theyre available this still shows they are a vital member of the team and is certainly not player hogging. Therefore they shouldn't have concerns imo. And I understand rodriguez and sczezeny may see themselves as important back up players being next in line in their positions, but even so... It shouldn't matter if rodriguez is 3rd choice or 8th choice, he is 21 and 89 rated, realistically he shouldn't expect t
  14. Re: Player Concerns (please read the Online Help if looking for help) These concerns are getting a bit ridiculous now... First of all I have Lavezzi concerned due to lack of games, despite appearing in 20 out of 24 league matches and most of my cup games. OK so the majority of those league appearances were as a sub but even so... SM need to strike a balance between realism and fun, but these increased concerns are just leaning way to far towards realism at the expense of fun. The primary role of concerns should be to stop player hogging, but how can I be player hogging Lavezzi when he featur
  • Create New...