Jump to content

mudskipper

Members
  • Posts

    114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mudskipper

  1. Re: English Championship 28697 Betting Thread

    Current Balance - 600

    Stake - 200

    New Balance - 400

    Bet - Tottenham to win (2/5)

    Profit - 80

    Current Balance - 400

    Stake - 500

    New Balance - 0

    Bet - Reading to win (2/5)

    Profit - 200

    I'm all in :P cm'n Reading ana Spurs

    You are more than all in as you have staked 700 from a starting balance of 600

  2. Re: English Championship 28697 Discussion Thread

    Does that mean that wages have always been per game? Crikey' date=' it's only taken me 5 years to realise this, d'oh...

    Even so, it doesn't explain why I'm suddenly losing 1.4m per week when I've broken even for 5 years with largely the same squad. My wages on the squad screen is 1.4m which is why I put two and two together...[/quote']

    I think in these EC there are 40 turns per season so some turns contain 2 games if you are playing 46 league games.

  3. Re: Uruguayan League

    Giorgian de Arrascaeta

    he is on the database fella ;) better known as Giorgian Benedetti

    i looked into him and found his full name was Giorgian de Arrascaeta Benedetti

    This guy has been retired on soccer wiki has he picked up a bad injury?

  4. Re: Riferimento: Guess at next leagues to be reviewed, & discuss SM's review policy..

    ;2488332']Mitrovic played second tier last season for FC Teleoptik of the Prva Liga' date=' so a lower division. So forget those minutes he amassed, he has had the rating for them.

    Partizan play in the Serbian top flight Super Liga.

    Mitrovic has amassed 687 mins in the top flight so far, 14 apps, 7 starts & scored 6 goals. More of an rotation player or impact sub IMO, rather than a strike partner. I cant see him rising any more than +1 or +2 currently.

    So how do you suppose the 'fan boys' got this higher rating for Lazar Markovic? the only way is to input the correct wrong or missing data on his profile.

    If you want Mitrovic reviewing he is missing profile data. & that is still if SW/SM approve it and choose to review the rating.[/quote']

    In this reply you say the only way to get a higher rating is to correct or input missing data on a players profile. What happens to players with correct data but out of date rating as an example Akihiro Hayashi as far as I can see he is at the right club , his position is correct and height and weight information are in place. Will players such as this only get a rating increase if they move clubs?

  5. Re: PLEASE SM - Reintroduce the rating schedule!!

    Hello everyone :) All of our data is transferred over from the Soccer Wiki and it is their community that keeps it up to data. Due to their community being able to update any data at any time it is not practical to have a league schedule.

    Why have the links to soccer wiki been removed in the latest update to the layout of SM? If soccer wiki is the only way that the data is kept up to date shouldn't you be helping to promote it within the game?

  6. Re: Guess at next leagues to be reviewed, & discuss SM's review policy........

    What is the current reason/excuse for the pace of reviews being so slow? We are no longer in a transfer window,the new player positions have been around for a while,pointless addition of height and weight have been done so what is slowing it down or is this now the pace we should expect going forward?

  7. Re: Riferimento: The New Players Thread

    John Lustrand added at 81.. Amazing talent or SoccerWiki mistake?

    Looks like a mistake to me would have thought he would have been added as 75 rated maybe 76/77 tops.Will be interesting to see what he goes for in competitive set ups as some clubs will be able to offer inxs of £15 million.

  8. Re: Guess at next leagues to be reviewed, & discuss SM's review policy........

    It seems to me that goalkeepers are getting missed under the new system as there're is no way to put in a spurious position change on SW to get a rating review.The spurious position changes to get reviews are what i find annoying about the new system changing a RB by adding DMR and then removing it a few weeks later hoping for another review just seems wrong.

  9. Re: English Premiership Rating Predictions 2012/13

    I'll reserve judgment on those four until tomorrow as I think they'll all rise in the morning as part of a second phase. If they don't rise then there's clear bias against Stoke who may not appeal to everyone but are' date=' undisputably, a solid mid-table Premier League club.

    Crouch should not have dropped although I have no complaints as to the other fallers...

    Begovic, Shawcross & Huth should be 89.

    Walters should be 88.

    Let's see...[/quote']

    No rises shocked that Stoke goalkeeper and defenders haven't been rewarded for their good form for the past couple of seasons.stoke don't concede many it is only a lack of goals that is holding them back.

  10. Re: English Premiership Rating Predictions 2012/13

    I think its insulting to the actual brain if soccer manager thinks that Begovic ' date=' Shawcross , Walters , Huth didnt go up in rating an even Crouch to drop to 88 when he has performed much better than other 89 rated fwds and een 90 rated ones. Tommorow i think they will but it right with 4 of those players. Including Butlabd is a Stoke player now so he should rise to at leat 85/6[/quote']

    I agree I thought Huth,Walters,Shawcross and Begovic would have all got +1 it seems not as Stoke have been done today.

  11. Re: Liga BBVA Ratings 2012/2013

    ;2439688']JEEZZZUUUSSSS christt

    SM

    Moreno JUANFRAN - 74 rated.

    Still. after years of constantly playing for Castilla

    7407 mins' date=' 95 apperances!

    SORT IT OUT!!!

    :P[/b']

    I think all the Castilla players that got reviewed were on loan from Real Madrid.Juanfran is on the database as a Castilla player not on loan from Real Madrid so think this might be why he didn't get reviewed .should rise to 83 IMO if they do review him.

×
×
  • Create New...