Jump to content

Troianos77

Members
  • Content Count

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Troianos77

  1. For the second point, as I said, it COULD be not realistic for SOME 90 players being as good or better than a 95 player. It depends a lot on how easy it will be for a player to get the +5 rating. If it as easy for any player, regardless of his age, current rating, recent rating changes to get a +5 it could be not so realistic. But of course, it is not always the case. For example, is not so impossible for a 20 year old 90 rated João Felix to grow within the game in one or two seasons get to a 93~95. But I don't think that as was already said it is so possible or even fair for a 33 year old
  2. I think, at least from what I read and think myself, is not the flexible rating itself. But it is about how it will be implemented. Because depending on how it is done not only it could not be good, but it could ruin an aspect of the game that a lot of people like that is the real world determining the ratings. As for your points on why it is good the flexible rating. At least from what I understand three of them could be fixed only by making more clear on what and how much form, concern and morale influence on the game. It is not necessary to change the rating to determine this. And other
  3. Thanks. These changes in current rating will be fixed or dinamic? Meaning, it will be as easy for a 93 player to go up(or down) a rating as a 85? And will they occur in fixed times of a season like current concerns (rounds 12, 24 and 36) or can they happen at any given moment?
  4. Very interesting to see the game being updated after quite sometime. Some of these changes are more then welcomed. Hope that they are properly thought through and tested. But as some already said, and I also play the game for the some time, I've a few questions over some of these changes: How would the flexible rating work in case of the player being sold? He'll be back to his base rating? Or maintain his current rating? And if his base rating changes will his current rating improve accordingly? As these things could change a lot on how much the real world influences on the game. The same c
  5. Oyarzabal, Pepé or Coman? Would you stay with any of these? Or none of them. It could be more than one. They are not my first team pick.
  6. Would you sell any of these Pépé, Coman and Pulisic (considering they're not your best options on the team). And if so who would you sell?
  7. If you need more a DC I'd go for Gomez, especially as he covers all 3 positions at the back. But Pavard is also a good position even more for a right fullback.
  8. Any chance of Mahrez getting a +1? He's having a very good season for now. 11 assists and 9 goals in pl. I know that being 29 he probably won't grow much. But maybe one increase more.
  9. Thanks. And I'm sorry, but right after posting the question I received a counter offer from the other player. So I had to edit, also because of the confusion about pereira.
  10. I'm sorry, by pereira I meant ricardo pereira. And which would you prefer kamara or konate?
  11. Would you buy Pavard + Kamara or Konate for ricardo pereira + harvey elliott?
  12. My bad, i mistyped, I meant brandt (borussia).
  13. Arthur or Brant? Regardless of position. Only potential in short(next review) to mid term. And Diego Carlos or Caleta-Car?
  14. Will the big 5 leagues get their review "normally"? I mean in terms of when they are getting reviewed not necessarily the reviews themselves as we have a exceptional situation. And do you think Nübel should get an increase? 89 maybe? One more thing there has been any change recently in how the concerns are computed? Because I'm getting a lot of players who play fairly frequently growing in concerns. Even Nübel which is 88 and played almost half the games has grown in concerns. If not is there any post here with the rules on how they are computed?
  15. Would you trade M. Dembele(I have him) for Joao Felix? I expected a lot from Joao felix, but at atletico I don't think he'll be a great goal scorer or make a lot of assists. Of course it's only his first season, but I'm a little doubtful. As for Dembele I don't know much of his potential. I prefer mid term potential then short term as both would be reserves...
  16. Ziyech or Eriksen? Of course considering ratings and the little difference in age Eriksen is better. But considering what Eriksen has been playing recently and the uncertainty about where is going to I'm a little doubtful. Who would you prefer?
  17. What is the chance of City's Mendy of increasing in rating? Would you swap Gaya for him?
  18. Don't think it will be solved so quickly. It envolves debts that the team has with the player, the former club of the player and the agent of the player. It already has a legal action so this things, unless some agreement is made, tend to prolong in Brazil. And I don't think that Cruzeiro will simply let the player go to its rival so easily. So I'd be on look to see how the situation develops. Because it could be detrimental to his career stay the way as it's now as he could not leave and not be played because of the sue to the club.
  19. He's a good player. And probably will develop a lot if he has more chances and game time. But you've to know that after Cruzeiro got relegated and had a lot of troubles concerning debts and the director's board the team is changing a lot. A lot of players are leaving and he may or not stay there so his development may be postponed depending on where he goes to. This applies to others players there. Some like him even are suing the team and may leave through legal actions.
  20. Would you trade Hakimi(mine) for O. Dembele or Pavard? And for both? Consider that both fullbacks and wingers are equally needed. So don't need to consider positions. Only the players themselves and their prospect. I was considering both, but as Dembele is not playing well at Barcelona I have my doubts.
  21. Thanks for the opinion. I've not made my mind even though It could like it. I'm sorry if i didn't express myself properly. I was just laying the ground and showing my opinion on some of the players as I've not seen the same amount of games for all of them. But I'm more than willing to change my mind with more opinions. That's why I was asking.
  22. If you had to pick at most 4 out of Richarlison, M. Gomez, T. Hazard, M. Dembele, Everton S. and Gabriel Barbosa. Who would you pick? My impressions from some of the numbers and games that I see: Everton could be getting a transfer really soon so maybe hold on to him would be good. Gabriel Barbosa had an amazing season at Flamengo, but of course the disparity between teams was too big. From what I can see Dembele is having a good season and T. Harzard is handling well at a irregular Dortmund. Don't see much of Gomez but doesn't seem to be having a good season, at least from what was expect
  23. Between Pepé, Fekir and Insigne if you had to buy two of them which would you buy?
  24. Yeah, I do think he's a good player. But as he has been quite irregular for Barcelona that's my worry. And he's the only decent 91 player available, I don't think there are decent 90 available either, but I'll check again. And I don't need him exactly, like I said I've Pepe, Ziyech, Thauvin and as substitures: Brozovic, Everton, Bruno Fernandes, Richarlison, Maxi Gomez and Thorgan Harzard. But It would not be bad having another player, my doubt is only because I don't know if he'll rise in the future or even maintain his rating for a long time if he continues having problems in and out of the
  25. Has Barcelona's Dembele any chance of rising in the near future? Because he's available in one of my gameworlds, but a lot of teams will compete for him, so If I do buy him I'll be spending a lot of money on him. At my starting team I've Pepe, Ziyech and Thauvin as of now. As much as he as good as them now(at least in rating), I now that he is not so regular at Barcelona and didn't achieve what was assumed of him when at Dortmund...
×
×
  • Create New...