Jump to content

amar19

Members
  • Content Count

    611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

amar19 last won the day on July 6 2015

amar19 had the most liked content!

About amar19

  • Rank
    Literal Wizard

core_pfieldgroups_99

  • Location
    Birmingham
  • Interests
    Creative Writing, Football, Gym.
  • Occupation
    Current Student- Aspiring Solicitor
  • Favourite Football Club
    Liverpool F.C and Dortmund
  • Participating In Following Setups
    English Championship 6352
  • Favourite Football Player
    Mario Gotze. Marco Reus. Xherdan Shaqiri.
  • SM Honours Won
    5 x Division 1 Winner. 1 x Charity Shield. 1 x English Cup. 1 x Community Shield
  1. I do find this review somewhat unusual to be honest. It's very much a scatter graph approaching without very much direction. In the other reviews you had SM review one team at a time. Now it's very much all over the place. We've had Kane rise after they had reviewed his team mates then Arsenal and then Chelsea players. I personally think SM is for once taking our views on board. That can only presumably be a good thing.
  2. Considering Kane has now become a 90 I have an unfortunate dilemma on my hands. Who should I keep out of Icardi and Kane ? Both are 90 but I am leaning towards Kane. Young and English seems to be the gold standard in the game. What does everyone else think ?
  3. Alexis rising to 94 has happened and I'm sure it's something that both you and I, and a lot of other people agree with ! Now drawing reference to Neymar I don't really buy the whole your rating is relative to your age argument. Neymar in his first season had an above par season at best, does that warrant a 93 ? Not in my book. Alexis Sanchez had a better season in 2013/14 than Neymar scored in El Classico and against Atletico Madrid on the final game of the season. Why didn't he deserve a rise ? Now don't say he's too old now, because the last time I checked he's under 30. Griezman had a
  4. Neymar has literally been carried to 95 having played only 2 full seasons in Europe. I certainly think he warrants a 95 after winning the treble, but you can't deny his rating had been accelerated considerably when you see the likes of Ribery and Robben busting their backsides season after season to reach 95. I remember after the confederations cup he was given a +1 to 92. He was then subsequently given a +1 to 93 without even kicking a ball for Barcelona upon signing for Barcelona. Neymar didn't exactly shine in his first year at Barca like Alexis did at Arsenal in his first season in Englan
  5. Neymar has literally been carried to 95 having played only 2 full seasons in Europe. I certainly think he warrants a 95 after winning the treble, but you can't deny his rating had been accelerated considerably when you see the likes of Ribery and Robben busting their backsides season after season to reach 95. I remember after the confederations cup he was given a +1 to 92. He was then subsequently given a +1 to 93 without even kicking a ball for Barcelona upon signing for Barcelona. Neymar didn't exactly shine in his first year at Barca like Alexis did at Arsenal in his first season in Englan
  6. Hazard going to 95 because of the domestic double is understandable and very much warranted. If Alexis doesn't rise to 94 after the Copa America win it's the biggest rating sham since Pogba not rising. The Copa America is the second biggest honour after the World Cup for a South American. I personally think Alexis Sanchez is the better player in comparison to Hazard because he offers a more direct goal presence, something which Hazard hasn't really convinced me with apart from scoring penalties. If you switch their respective teams I reckon Alexis can easily reach 95 at Chelsea. Hazard s
  7. Alexis Sanchez not rising +1 to 94 after winning the Copa America is just beyond me. He won the second most prestigious international honour after a WorldCup and still doesn't warrant a +1. Funny how international honours mean something when the mighty Spain win a European Championship but yet when the 'underachieving' Chile win a competition which features Brazil, Argentina, Columbia and Uruguay it's not really worth anything of note. Alexis Sanchez should rightly be a 94. But whatever, not like the views of this forum are worth anything when SM makes it's rating changes. Very much like pr
  8. But you do realise this is how the transfer market works in reality which has been done for decades ? Most recent example is Chelsea, you do realise De Bruyne and Lukaku were essentially bought, farmed out and sold out for big profit ?. Farming risers is pretty the only way a smaller team can compete with the bigger teams in regards to financial revenue. Do you really think a small team with a 20k stadium can compete with Manchester United boasting the biggest stadium in England ? Your drive for real life realism will pretty rule out smaller clubs from competing which will ultimately establish
  9. I have come to the conclusion that SM don't really give a toss about the view of the community despite claims saying that views of the community are valued by SM. Case and point look at all the criticism this new forum layout has recieved. SM are pretty much burying their head in the sand despite the fact that the majority of the forum members have been driven away by the introduction of the new forum. There comes a point where you cut your losses and accept that you have errored and in doing so take steps to correct the problem. SM have shown no willingness to even listen to the community a
×
×
  • Create New...