Jump to content

Tactical change bug


Jimmy Mack
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would like to draw a bug to other forumers attention. It has been clear to me for a number of weeks now that when you make an in-game tactical change, eg moving a player designated CB/DM from CB in a 4-4-2 formation to DM in a 4-5-1, that player is, more often than not, marked down in his match rating as if he has played out of position. This also occurs when playing a F/W in both positions during a game.

I have ended up in the preposterous position of having a team dominate a game and all the players being rated between 8 and 10, except for the one who moved from Forward to Wing at 75 mins who received a 4 - despite scoring two goals and not being booked and being designated an F/W. It seems that the match engine is ignoring secondary designations and assuming that player is 'out of position' when he is moved 'in game'.

Has anybody else noticed this? If you've wondered why a player is consistently getting 4's or 5's when the rest of the team is getting higher ratings then the in-game tactical changes are a probable culprit.

BTW: I reported this 'bug' on the 26th January and was told it is being 'monitored' by a member of the technical staff. Meanwhile my players averages are being adversley affected for no valid reason. SM should either sort this out or do away with secondary designations during in-game play. Either way we deserve to be told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tactical change bug

I would like to draw a bug to other forumers attention. It has been clear to me for a number of weeks now that when you make an in-game tactical change' date=' eg moving a player designated CB/DM from CB in a 4-4-2 formation to DM in a 4-5-1, that player is, more often than not, marked down in his match rating as if he has played out of position. This also occurs when playing a F/W in both positions during a game.

I have ended up in the preposterous position of having a team dominate a game and all the players being rated between 8 and 10, except for the one who moved from Forward to Wing at 75 mins who received a 4 - despite scoring two goals and not being booked and being designated an F/W. It seems that the match engine is ignoring secondary designations and assuming that player is 'out of position' when he is moved 'in game'.

Has anybody else noticed this? If you've wondered why a player is consistently getting 4's or 5's when the rest of the team is getting higher ratings then the in-game tactical changes are a probable culprit.

BTW: I reported this 'bug' on the 26th January and was told it is being 'monitored' by a member of the technical staff. Meanwhile my players averages are being adversley affected for no valid reason. SM should either sort this out or do away with secondary designations during in-game play. Either way we deserve to be told.[/quote']

I have noticed that too. A few weeks ago, I made an in-game tactical switch from 4-2-3-1 to 3-5-2 at half time, thereby making Sergio Busquet move from CB position 5 (4-2-3-1) to a DM position 5 in 3-5-2.

He ended with a match rating of 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tactical change bug

I have noticed that too. A few weeks ago' date=' I made an in-game tactical switch from 4-2-3-1 to 3-5-2 at half time, thereby making Sergio Busquet move from CB position 5 (4-2-3-1) to a DM position 5 in 3-5-2.

He ended with a match rating of 5.[/quote']

You'll probably find it keeps happening if you keep the same in-game tactics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tactical change bug

invol Connecticut Asian Escort surveying over 3000 Americans from seven different Connecticut Escort to three days of the attack. Participants were asked to could remember of the day itself, their personal circumstances at Connecticut Asian Escorts time, and how they felt. To find out the same Connecticut Escorts months later, and the atta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Tactical change bug

I'm surprised there haven't been more comments on this problem with the match engine. I'm still getting instances of players getting 4's and 5's where they should be getting 7 or 8+.

My question is: Does this have a bearing on match outcomes or is it just cosmetic? Unfortunately SM haven't replied to my bug ticket yet, so this is very much an unknown quantity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...