English Premiership Rating Predictions

[Damien1990 218]

What a surprise, Hazard, Fabregas and others avoid the drop.

[Sir Rahul 7,753]

I'm going to keep updating that list as we go through the review. 

[antondrobnjak 1,596]

OKay that CANNOT be it for Chelsea.

 

also Defoe 15 goals for Sunderland (17th) 88 (also older SM hates that). Ighalo 15 goals Watford (12th) Nothing?

 

Surely they have to revisit Ighalo and, y'know, MOST OF CHELSEA!

 

So John Obi Mikel bought a D(C ) position last night at the position discount...

[tupac_healy 1,696]

Tomorrow will be a big day in the history of SM ratings....

Opportunity to really come down hard on a bunch of underachievers, my prediction....

SM bottle it

.

Ah the ever predictable SM.....

Bottled it BIG TIME

[kylepearson 129]

I thought Gareth Barry had a decent season wasn't expecting him to drop

[kylepearson 129]

If that Chelsea review isn finished that's pretty poor. Man United should probably escape loads of changes now which wouldn't be fair. Players deserve to drop.

[german_xlxs 83]

Chelsea's review IS NOT over...... is it?????      

[The punch 357]

review chelsea tomorrow ?

[moneyball 51]

Jack Cork not getting a rise looks an oversight. He has been very consistent this season and one of swansea's better players

[LauraAFCA 3,715]

I thought Gareth Barry had a decent season wasn't expecting him to drop

Came here to say exactly this

[riky87 380]

Chelsea's review IS NOT over...... is it?????

I hope it's not over. IF it's over it will be an absolute shame. Not dropping Hazard is not fair. Six months ago B. Schweinsteiger was dropped twice in 6 months (from 95 to 93) after a not brilliant season (and Hazard season was awful) even if he was still playing regularly for the german National Team. Hazard at the moment cannot be on the same level of Ibrahimovic and of T. Muller or Aguero who played much better seasons. He has to drop at least to 94. No doubt about it.

[CAFC28 374]

Given that quite a lot of players have been missed across the big leagues, I reckon they'll probably leave some of them until after the Euro's, rather than bother having to look at them twice in the space of a few months.

I know it's a long shot, as some "big names" have been reviewed already, but I hope that's the case, because if it's not, this has to be one of the laziest, most inconsistent and frankly farked up review session I've seen in all my time on SM.

 

If, for example, Hazard plays well at the Euro's, they could try and justify him staying rather than dropping.

[The punch 357]

wow Hazard fabregas costa matic pedro stay ???

[Ste G 1,846]

HA, the people who do the ratings need replacing. 

[vitor_mfc 3,862]

I think that we will see Chelsea changes tomorrow.

[th3stain 125]

Anyone know which teams will be reviewed tomorrow?

 

Edit: nevermind.

[tupac_healy 1,696]

I think that we will see Chelsea changes tomorrow.

Yeah, and after they do that they can go back and fix all the mistakes they made in Germany and Italy....

Chelsea are done, good indicator of this is they have moved on to the team above them....

As per usual, SM have made a balls of it

[riky87 380]

So, to sum up, Chelsea arrived 10th in the league, playing an awful season, and the only relevant players dropped are Terry (-1) and Mikel(-1)? I don t want to believe it. It's an absolute joke.

[Hoggzeh 31]

Kirchhoff should have gotten a +1 for us since Kone did, and Kaboul shouldn't have dropped to an 86, the rest was expected.

 

Still feel like Defoe shouldn't have gotten the -1 in December and should have had a +2 to correct it to make him an 89. 

[Puma7 106]

So, to sum up, Chelsea arrived 10th in the league, playing an awful season, and the only relevant players dropped are Terry (-1) and Mikel(-1)? I don t want to believe it. It's an absolute joke.

Cesc dropped in December not sure if anyone else did.

[Jamie3184 7,394]

I agree with your point about not being able to compare Jansen to the Prem, Nor did i try. My sentence was to illustrate that Janssen who has had a more impressive season will likely be outranked or equal with Townsed. If Janssen had have a season like that in EPL he would be much higher, but EPL > Eredivise which we can statistically articulate due to European comps. This means his rating, is restricted by his league. Andros just rode a sinking ship into the Champ. So yes i agree with your first point, as it illustrates mine. The second one i also agree with but is not the basis of any of my arguments.

 

Most. and by saying most i was leaving out the people who didn't feature in the first team at all, youths and co. All First team/squad players rated above 85/86 need adjusting.

 

Sarcasm does not become you. I'd try to avoid it.

 

He was indeed part of the team, and he was part of it for less than most absolutely, but he was still part of it and thus assigned some blame. Less than most, yes but still some. It works both ways as we have seen before in teams that are excelling one of the poorer players get swept up in the ratings ride, Lovren comes to mind, Kampl just very recently. Kompany's 94 when he was le bad. So while there are those that should see a bigger drop due to being worse than Townsend and/or having been in the team for more of the failed season, He is still, ultimately culpable.

 

Last point, Andros Minutes are in Ulloa, King and Schlupp territory for Foxes. King rated too far off to compare at all. Schlupp probably the most similar position although has 330mins (3.3 games more) but has scored less. He will get a +1 100% with an outside chance for +2 but id wager a +1. Ulloa with 1.3 games less miutes has scored 6 assisted 2. now he is a fwd granted, so a goal every 160mins is expected to be higher than Andros 270mins but in the same ballpark, Not a striker adjusted. I would be rising Ulloa +1 to 88 as well. So if Andros was at Leicester, being higher than those 2 and not starting, I would probably stay him. Assuming he would probably displace one of them if he was actually there, then I would say +1/stay. So I think this somewhat sums up my position on team being relegated = rating change as somehwat bit part players like Ulloa and Schlupp will rise at Leicester for winning, despite not being the most to blame for that success, I would see Andros see the reverse.

 

As an afterthought In my mind just then an image of Andros the getaway driver was conjured up with Sissoko, Mitrovic and Colback robbing the bank and shooting some people. Andros would likely get a shorter sentence but a sentence nonetheless. If i had the skill i would draw that picture.

 

Me, sarcastic? Nooo, Never.

 

I’m glad you agree with me. Not that you had any choice, I am always right after all.

 

So you agree that Townsend does not deserve to drop then. I can only assume that is why you have used examples of players undeserving of rising. Glad you agree with my correct analysis again.

 

Townsend deserves to drop because he is culpable by being associated with a relegated team that he wasn’t really much to blame for. Along with examples of players that you didn’t think deserved to rise due to them being very poor but in good teams. That makes absolutely zero sense, you’re more mixed up than a fruit cake sunny Jim.

 

90% of the last bit is illegible but from what I can gather Townsend would stay, maybe a chance of a +1 if he wore a Leicester shirt with the same performances. Little hypocritical to drop him -2 to 86 in that case just for being in a Newcastle shirt.

[Paddy Garrett 7]

This Chelsea review is actually sickening...its just unbelievable, theres no point mentioning stats ect because anyone who knows anything about the pl knows that they have been awful.  My grandma would know to give hazard at least a -1 and she's dead.....

[tupac_healy 1,696]

The shocking part about the Chelsea review is that people are actually shocked?

Really nobody seen SM bottling it coming? I posted as much the night before....

SM over the last few years are not what you would call, dependable

[jaybee 954]

Cesc dropped in December not sure if anyone else did.

Ivanovic dropped too. Not sure if others did too.

[Cam Lucas 10,125]

Me, sarcastic? Nooo, Never.

 

I’m glad you agree with me. Not that you had any choice, I am always right after all.

 

So you agree that Townsend does not deserve to drop then. I can only assume that is why you have used examples of players undeserving of rising. Glad you agree with my correct analysis again.

 

Townsend deserves to drop because he is culpable by being associated with a relegated team that he wasn’t really much to blame for. Along with examples of players that you didn’t think deserved to rise due to them being very poor but in good teams. That makes absolutely zero sense, you’re more mixed up than a fruit cake sunny Jim.

 

90% of the last bit is illegible but from what I can gather Townsend would stay, maybe a chance of a +1 if he wore a Leicester shirt with the same performances. Little hypocritical to drop him -2 to 86 in that case just for being in a Newcastle shirt.

 

Nope. Schlupp bit part at LEI will get +1 for small sucess, Kante large part +3 for big success. Stands to follow Mbemba -2 big part of NEW failures, Townsend -1 small part in NEW failures.

 

Also I said -1 for Andros, not -2? Multiple times in fact.