Jump to content
Peppo Espy

Serie A Rating Predictions

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, lunastorta said:
3 hours ago, th3stain said:

Bonaventura 91 - 15 league games/2 goals/5 assists.

Joao Mario 91 -  14/1/3.

Bernardeschi 88 - 17/7/1.

Makes little sense.

 I am pretty sure its not just the stats that increases or decreases a players value. The impact of the player for his team and how eye-catching his performances are. 

If Bernardeschi gets linked to a top team continuously he will soon get a rise regardless of his form ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Felipe Anderson has played 90% of his games as a RW & the rest as a SS & he somehow gets a RB positioning, he doesn't even get back out of possession to defend as a RWB let alone RB, absolutely absurd. I believe he has been given this RB/RWB versatility because Lazio have adapted at times a 3-5-2 but should there have been games watched it's evident he is not a RB & even a RWB is a huge overstep. 

As mentioned, he's a higher rated RB than Elseid Hysaj, genuinely is there some kind of racist anti-Albanian establishment or something because this is actually quite the insult. 

Pjanic +1 was perhaps a little sooner than it should have been however he is 93 quality, what however is slightly not right is that now Marchisio is rated the same as him & I believe is a far more superior & important player, even within the Juve side you can see the important of Marchisio over Pjanic. 

Even Alex Sandro went to 91. On the basis of this season he has been that good however he played 1500 minutes the whole of last season & wasn't an overly dominant LB in terms of defending or attacking phases. Hysaj competed over double the minutes & certainly defensively was twice the player Sandro was however less efficient going forward which is more so down to Napoli playing a back 4 to Juve playing a 3-5-2. 

Dybala had a 93 season last time out & has been hit by injury this term however has still shown in the minutes that he did play that he is better than a 91 rated player for sure, he's now on par with Icardi who has a considerable amount less to his game overall than Paulo does. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, th3stain said:

He has the second highest average rating on Whoscored after Astori (who didn't get a rise either). He's been linked with both Chelsea and Napoli. I'm sorry but this one makes no sense.

Is this in reference to Niang your quote is invisible  ? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fulsome rise for many Roma's players and not +1 for Juventus, except Sandro and Pjanic?

Higuain? Dybala? Bonucci? Barzagli? Or Mandzukic?

You increase the rating for players who have not won anything (Roma, Napoli, Milan, Brozovic and Joao Mario - Inter!!!) and no rise for who win championship and national cup for 5 years in row?

What's wrong with you, SM?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 21/12/2016 at 8:46 AM, th3stain said:

Bonaventura 91 - 15 league games/2 goals/5 assists.

Joao Mario 91 -  14/1/3.

Bernardeschi 88 - 17/7/1.

Makes little sense.

Bonaventura 91 - 15 league games/2 goals/5 assists. nope

Joao Mario 91 -  14/1/3. European Champion

Bernardeschi 88 - 17/7/1. nope 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, th3stain said:

How does Joao Mario rising in this review have anything to do with the EURO's?

Since he get the 90?!...was hired for 40 something million...and entered to starting XI...and made a difference in a crapy team.

Transfermarkt:

Bonaventura 91 - 21 M

Joao Mario 91 -  35 M.

Bernardeschi 88 - 16 M

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, TMCosta said:

Since he get the 90?!...was hired for 40 something million...and entered to starting XI...and made a difference in a crapy team.

Transfermarkt:

Bonaventura 91 - 21 M

Joao Mario 91 -  35 M.

Bernardeschi 88 - 16 M

And i didnt said that i agree...just dont compare with 2 trashy players who didn t won anything ever...... :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Mario got his 90 for the euros, he didnt deserve that 91 yet at all. Very premature. 

bonaventura deserved his 91... and you cant tell me Bernardeschi didnt deserve any rise at all?

Andrea Conti didnt even rise either.. like.. how? why?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Sir Rahul said:

Mario and Bonaventura shouldn't have risen, no rise for Dybala, Bernardeschi, Conti, Linetty, measly rise for Gagliardini, Serie A review was terrible 

Agreed....for me...João Mario 90, Bonaventura 89 (For now...never win anything), Bernardeschi 88,5 (89 n the end of season)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...