Jump to content

Bundesliga Ratings Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Re: Bundesliga Ratings Discussion Bayern München NEUER, Manuel GK 95 ⇒ 95 REINA, Pepe GK 91 ⇘ 91/90 STARKE, Tom GK 87 ⇘ 87/86 LAHM, Philipp D(RL),DM(RLC) 95 ⇒ 95 ALABA, David D,DM(L),M(LC) 93 ⇗

Ratings 2012/2013 by timesle I talked to Phil recently and he told me that he is not going to make a new prediction thread for the next rating changes. Of course these are bad news for the whole for

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013 Updated: December 14th, 2012 Goalkeeper Risers Marc-André TER STEGEN 87 => 88 / 89 Bernd LENO 87 => 88 Kevin TRAPP 86 => 87 Sebast

Posted Images

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

Soccerwiki was the worst invention ever...seriously :o

As for ratings' date=' SM (or Wiki) whoever it is is MILES to generous with ratings nowdays, you used to have to earn your stripes but nowdays players get up to elevated levels 88+ with no real reason for it....

The old days, system of rating was much more consistant, accurate and kept a sense of realism.

I am afraid you dont have to do anything nowdays and you get bumped up to ridiculous levels....numerous examples in Germany and many other leagues[/quote']

I think ratings reviews aren't that bad nowadays, sure there is some discrepancies, and annoying things, but the players ratings are being somewhat accurate, we can't forget there is a constant evolution of the players and the reviews must reflect that. I'm not happy with every review, of course, but they can't please Greeks and Trojans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

I think ratings reviews aren't that bad nowadays' date=' sure there is some discrepancies, and annoying things, but the players ratings are being somewhat accurate, we can't forget there is a constant evolution of the players and the reviews must reflect that. I'm not happy with every review, of course, but they can't please Greeks and Trojans.[/quote']

If you define accurate as being within 5 points of a serious rating then yes :o

I get your point mate and you are right, its not like all ratings are ridiculous, but the % of ridiculous ratings has definately got bigger and that's not really something I can appreciate (and I think others with me).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

Soccerwiki was the worst invention ever...seriously :o

As for ratings' date=' SM (or Wiki) whoever it is is MILES to generous with ratings nowdays, you used to have to earn your stripes but nowdays players get up to elevated levels 88+ with no real reason for it....

The old days, system of rating was much more consistant, accurate and kept a sense of realism.

I am afraid you dont have to do anything nowdays and you get bumped up to ridiculous levels....numerous examples in Germany and many other leagues[/quote']

I don't need convincing as I totally agree....all the time & money that's been wasted on something that's basically useless and which could've been used on improving the actual game instead!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

I don't need convincing as I totally agree....all the time & money that's been wasted on something that's basically useless and which could've been used on improving the actual game instead!

these are the totally clueless comments i expect from people who dont actually understand soccerwiki & see how much soccerwiki has massively improved the game and its database.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

;2400159']these are the totally clueless comments i expect from people who dont actually understand soccerwiki & see how much soccerwiki has massively improved the game and its database.

Nothing else was expected, but a desperate attempt to defend and justify SM and Cancerwiki, as always... :rolleyes: After all, this is THE No.1 SCOUT OF CANCERWIKI SPEAKING HERE! :rolleyes::rolleyes:

The SAD reality everybody sees except you, is that after a year we have Cancerwiki operating, the reviews are getting slower and slower (2 teams per day for now...) and the database is less updated than ever!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

Nothing else was expected' date=' but a desperate attempt to defend and justify SM and Cancerwiki, as always... :rolleyes: After all, this is THE No.1 SCOUT OF CANCERWIKI SPEAKING HERE! :rolleyes::rolleyes:

The SAD reality everybody sees except you, is that after a year we have Cancerwiki operating, the reviews are getting slower and slower (2 teams per day for now...) and the database is less updated than ever![/quote']

less updated? LESS UPDATED? my god. another piece of top class utter drivel from yourself germlad.

look at the amount of players being updated daily, it has increased TREMENDOUSLY...the numbers are there. look at the pages on SM under player changes and soccerwiki under recent changes.... and count them all....it aint just all about the ratings...players that dont have a rating change still need to be looked at for a postion etc. you say slower just 2 teams..but look how much bigger those teams are, plus they have youth sides Schalke II, Stuttgart II etc....

cancerwiki? how intelligent. what on earth....all you do is complain/troll me....please try add something constructive to the threads for once....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

So, tomorrow we'll have 2 and 1/6 of a team evaluated...? Yesterday 2 teams...

Before yesterday 3...

What the hell is going on? Do they really have to think so much about Frankfurt and Mainz, they can't finish for once the rest? I don't get it, even Slovenia and Uruguay were faster than this. I'm a recent player, but this has changed quite a bit in the last months...

Maybe it's this winter transition. After that extremely calm December we are starving for ratings =p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

;2399019']KLONARIDIS rated 82

Xhaka/Neustader 88

erm slight difference there though isnt there....

people getting wound up over the size of increases when its really about the rating isnt it???

82 is still very low for a ligue 1 club????

The SM Cheerleader must always defend and justify SM in all cases and respond to everybody criticizes' date=' right??

"82 is still very low for a ligue 1 club" SO WHAT???

The big 5 leagues (including Ligue 1) are full of players 75-80 rated. In your "logic", all these should immediately have an increase, no matter if they play or not?! :eek:

You just couldn't think of anything else to justify Klonaridis UNJUSTIFIED +4, but you HAD to respond with something, didn't you? :rolleyes:

"[i']people getting wound up over the size of increases when its really about the rating isnt it???[/i]" SINCE WHEN THE SIZE OF INCREASES AND THE PERFORMANCES AREN'T IMPORTANT?! :eek::rolleyes:

If that was the case, and it was only... "really about the rating", then i.e. Marseille's Abdullah with more than 800 competitive minutes, shouldn't have got "only" +5, but he should have been at least the same as Klonaridis!

But, because the performances and the size of the increase ACTUALLY DO COUNT, AS THEY ALWAYS HAVE, Abdullah got a fair and just +5, to 80.

Klonaridis +4 to 82 for playing nothing is not only wrong, it's ridiculous. And ridiculous (actually, MORE ridiculous...) is you too, everytime you attempt to justify SM and "prove" how right they are and how perfect they are doing everything...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

;2400211']please try add something constructive to the threads for once....

I have posted many constructive and/or helpful comments in this forum. After all, the complaints/criticism/comments from the customers SHOULD have been used as feedback from every company (but SM doesn't seem to agree with this...).

If you think that constructive is to defend SM and Cancerwiki in EVERY single matter and attack everyone "dares" to complain or criticize something (out of many!) wrong in the game, then you are far from reality.

Just go cheer SM for the astonishing achievement of reviewing the next 2 teams... That would be very constructive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

;2400159']these are the totally clueless comments i expect from people who dont actually understand soccerwiki & see how much soccerwiki has massively improved the game and its database.

This is a totally clueless comment from a person who doesn't actually understand & see how much soccerwiki has massively reduced the quality of the game!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Bundesliga Ratings 2012/2013

Nothing else was expected' date=' but a desperate attempt to defend and justify SM and Cancerwiki, as always... :rolleyes: After all, this is THE No.1 SCOUT OF CANCERWIKI SPEAKING HERE! :rolleyes::rolleyes:

The SAD reality everybody sees except you, is that after a year we have Cancerwiki operating, the reviews are getting slower and slower (2 teams per day for now...) and the database is less updated than ever![/quote']

You couldn't be more right ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...