BenM 55 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Reviews We've already got enough threads' date=' and this one will just be combined into the other one anyway.[/quote']This one has a poll though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Burrow27 7,287 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: Ratings you disagree with! You are biased Ben' date=' gosh, you're the only one, or one of a very few, who think Dunne and Richards deserve a 90. Your response to my response is pretty lame itself.[/quote']Heres the facts, Man City are joint-sixth in the Goals Scored Table, but joint tenth in the Goals conceded table. Thats why Ireland got +1 and the Man City defence got -1s. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BenM 55 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: Ratings you disagree with! You are biased Ben' date=' gosh, you're the only one, or one of a very few, who think Dunne and Richards deserve a 90. Your response to my response is pretty lame itself.[/quote']Maybe Dunne didn't deserve 90, but I think Richards defintely did. Maybe SM should just scrap the current method of rating players all together and not have these reviews every so often. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mr. Razzcocks Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: Ratings you disagree with! Maybe Dunne didn't deserve 90' date=' but I think Richards defintely did.[b']Maybe SM should just scrap the current method of rating players all together and not have these reviews every so often.[/b] Hahahahahahahaha ! That is the funniest thing I've ever heard you say. And you've said some very funny things. How will SM be as good as it is if they just scrap the system ? Answer me that, smart-alec. You seem to have the best ideas on this forum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BenM 55 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: Ratings you disagree with! Hahahahahahahaha ! That is the funniest thing I've ever heard you say. And you've said some very funny things.How will SM be as good as it is if they just scrap the system ? Answer me that' date=' smart-alec. You seem to have the best ideas on this forum.[/quote'] I might write about it on a new thread, when I've thought more about how to phrase it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Mr. Razzcocks Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: Ratings you disagree with! I might write about it on a new thread' date=' when I've thought more about how to phrase it.[/quote']You are kidding me, right ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BenM 55 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: Ratings you disagree with! You are kidding me' date=' right ? [/quote']No, I think it will be better if I write about it in a new thread. When I do it, what section of the forums should I put it in? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CaRlHaNsoN 128 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes Evra hasn't been great lately but I think if Vidic and Ferdinand get 96's then I think Evra should have got 94, means Abidal is still best LB in the world without actually being so. Hargreaves and Rosicky rightfully down for their injuries, would've liked to see Riera go up though especially since Kuyt got a rise to 92. Agger should have gone up not Skrtel, definitely not 3 ratings between them. Luis Valencia rightfully up and Nani rightfully down, a shame to see it but Tevez down to 93 was probably right:( Either Deco should have gone down 2 or Carrick up 2, their not on the same level Carrick should be rated higher. Happy to see Alonso up to 94, and Fabregas keep his 95 since he's the best on my team, looks like Gallas has escaped the drop for now even if he'll play no further part this season. Anderson should have gone down. Sad to see Cech go down but it was the right thing to do he hasn't been the same since his injury, Van Persie hits that 93. Overall I'm pretty happy about these changes, especially on the youth with Collison +11 and Rafael +9, can't complain at all really, well done SM. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
burs 4,131 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: English Premier League ratings Also very disappointed to see Kuyt rise to 92 but Riera stay at 91. same here' date=' but kuyt's been the better of the 2 over the course of the season, so if one of the two was to rise, it should have been kuyt And Aurelio to 91 took me by surprise. Is he as good as Arbeloa? And tbh he lost his place to Insua (83) earlier in the season as well. tbh i think he's played just as well as arbeloa this season, and i think aurelio had an injury which is why insua got a run of games around december time, and since insua went to the SA u20s aurelio's won back his place and played very well Maybe Dunne didn't deserve 90' date=' but I think Richards defintely did.[/quote'] richards has been awful this year - lost his spot in the NT as well as bad form, could conceivably have dropped by -2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Zampa 972 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes I think Evra should have gone to 94, on the simple fact that there are a lack of decent LB in the database. Abidal (94) & Zambrotta (94) then Cole Lahm and Evra at 93 makes on 5 above 92, where as there are 9 RB's and 29 strikers rated 93 and above. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
#rooneyisyummy# 2,431 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: Ratings you disagree with! No' date=' I think it will be better if I write about it in a new thread.When I do it, what section of the forums should I put it in?[/quote'] put in SM SUGGESTIONS Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blue.hawk 21 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes I thought Lampard deserved a rise Whats SM doing with the ratings ???? Anelka's only 92 ???? Mikel only a 91 ??? (he was really effective during Essien's absence) Giovani dos santos is only a -1 ???? It should have been -2/-3 Carrick should have been 93 This sucks Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Louis 2,237 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes Annoyed at Lampard, Anelka, Ag and Young. hope tomoz. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
realx7madrid 424 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes No One Likes Man City, stupid sheikh. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Louis 2,237 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes No One Likes Man City' date=' stupid sheikh.[/quote']No one likes RM... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WRETCHRO 296 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes Glad that Essien stayed at 95:D Great player and would of been really sad to see him drop! Happy with all the big changes but i feel Lampard should be 96. According to SM Djourou>Evans:confused: I DON'T THINK SO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Chris_Razor 20 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes No rise for Anelka, A.Young and Agbonlahor is a complete joke in my opinion! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blue.hawk 21 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes No One Likes Man City' date=' stupid sheikh.[/quote']No one likes RM... This is really sarcatic . lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
blue.hawk 21 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes Lampard definitely deserved a rise along with Anelka and Mikel. Lampard should have been 96/97(a little optimistic) as he's been on fire and Anelka should have been 93 and Mikel should have been atleast a 92 because he was quite effective during Essien's absence....this proves SM are crazy How could Giovani Dos santos get only a -1, when he did not even feature properly, he should have been down to 84/85. Also, I dont understand, why Cech has got a -1, he was bad only in his last 2 games. Here we have Rosicky(who's been out for the season and did not play for even a single minute) and he gets only a -1 , he should have been 88/89 whereas Drogba goes down by 1 when he just returned to great form... this proves SM are baised when it comes to certain players...this sucks. I have the feeling that the reasearchers who have done the rating changes are not the same ones from the past. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
burs 4,131 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes According to SM Djourou>Evans:confused: they're both rated 88 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
realx7madrid 424 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes No one likes RM... Really. Harvard Case Study (Premier University in the United States) Team With Largest Fanbase In The World? Real Madrid, Suck It. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Louis 2,237 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes Really.Harvard Case Study (Premier University in the United States) Team With Largest Fanbase In The World? Real Madrid' date=' Suck It.[/quote'] Well according to Wikipedia it's Manchester United...Suck it, back on topic now.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
burs 4,131 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes how can anyone moan about drogba dropping - he's not been playing at a 96 standard for around 2 years and has warranted a drop for a while, and anelka hasnt played that well despite getting all those goals and IMO he was close to a 91 last time, so staying is probably fair on reflection Well according to Wikipedia it's Manchester United...Suck it' date=' back on topic now..[/quote']dude you trust wikipedia - lol!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Louis 2,237 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes how can anyone moan about drogba dropping - he's not been playing at a 96 standard for around 2 years and has warranted a drop for a while' date=' and anelka hasnt played that well despite getting all those goals and IMO he was close to a 91 last time, so staying is probably fair on reflectiondude you trust wikipedia - lol!!![/quote'] Obviously not, it was Wikianswers i used, i went onto two different sites and it also said United... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Football8 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Posted April 15, 2009 Re: EPL Rating Changes Well according to Wikipedia it's Manchester United...Suck it' date=' back on topic now..[/quote']You did know anyone can edit wikipedia. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.