Jump to content

Rahul W's rating predictions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Sir Rahul

    3176

  • Kieran_S91

    1683

  • Milanista1

    1158

  • Soccahappy

    972

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi all, As you have seen, I have not really been active over the past few months other than updating my preds. It's just been me phasing out of the forum. Now that the reviews are done, I can say

Just noticed this thread has crossed 1 million views, 23k odd replies, 930 pages.  I know this is 3 and a half years old but I never intended for this to monopolise the forum back then (I would h

Page 200- didn't think we'd get here when I started this casually- thanks all

Posted Images

11 minutes ago, lotorrent said:

Any chance Dean Henderson gets a +2 to 89?

Neves +1 to 91?

Thank you :)

I think Henderson has a chance at 89, been outstanding for Sheff United this season.

Neves stay at 90 for now, no European football next season. Not the greatest end to the season for Wolves.

3 minutes ago, The Mad Hatter said:

Dendoncker of Wolves, 89 rated, expected to get a +1. What does his future look like? 90+ potential? has he plateaued? Was his rise more due to team performance?

The ultimate workhorse in midfield for Wolves, should rise to 90 but I think that would be max unless Wolves can get back into Europe.

He should get a rise due to game time as well as some decent performance this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, The Mad Hatter said:

Dendoncker of Wolves, 89 rated, expected to get a +1. What does his future look like? 90+ potential? has he plateaued? Was his rise more due to team performance?

90, but may be capped at Wolves

49 minutes ago, lotorrent said:

Any chance Dean Henderson gets a +2 to 89?

Neves +1 to 91?

Thank you :)

Possible but 88 would be more prudent as his gametime might reduce next year

I don't think so

1 hour ago, Hrodulf said:

IMHO, Ronaldo dropping is good.  Messi, Busquets, Pique, Ramos etc should drop as well.  Are they as good today as a few years ago?   99 is not to be given just because you are the best player in the game.  97 is still great!   As their endurance, mobility etc deteriorate, their rating must reflect that. Neymar should have dropped a while ago too.  

Agreed, that is a good point, because a 98 Messi is still miles ahead of everything but a recognition that Messi was even better few years ago. 

I think Ramos is fine for now but Busquets, Pique should have dropped. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kierans91 said:

 

Neves stay at 90 for now, no European football next season. Not the greatest end to the season for Wolves.

The ultimate workhorse in midfield for Wolves, should rise to 90 but I think that would be max unless Wolves can get back into Europe.

i do not agree with you, a lot of quite similar players had increases to 91 ( zakaria, ginter etc ) and M'gladbach is no superior to Wolverhampton. the wolves had a fairly good season (PL and europa) and are now installed in the top 8 PL.

Neves is one of the best midfielder in PL and I'm 100% sure he's going up to 91 

and i would like him to sign for us to replace matic in the future but ole ole wants brooks ... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

More Final updates for Premiership Review below:-

Previous tables on pages 777, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784.785,786,787, 788, 789, 790, 791,792,793, 794,795,796,797,798,799,800,801,803,804,805.806,807,808,810,811,812,813,814.816,817,818,819,821,822,823,824,825,8826,827,828,829,830,831.832,833,834,835.836,837,839,841,842,844,845,855,856,857.860,864,866, 867.868,871,872,873,875,876,877,878,880,914,955,988. 1003,1008,1016, 1023.1026,1030, 1032,1042, 1045, 1047, 1055 , 1057, 1060, 1063, 1065, 1068, 1082, 1083, 1085, 1087, 1089, 1092, 1095, 1098, 1103,1106,1109,1118 ,1121, 1124 1126, 1132, 1138, 1141 Be careful of the Reddish boxes where the higher rated players are more inclined towards performances rather than stats.

SPREADSHEET WILL BE MORE READABLE WHEN SIDEBARS RETRACT IN Appx 3  PAGES TIME

OR straightway click on zoom to 125% or 150% and it's monster size and can be read Immediately. Left hand side of screen disappears entirely, great!

Minutes will vary game by game and league position also helps a lot. Anything over 0% indicates likely riser, higher the better/safer. Negative percentages don't predict a drop just less chances of a rise. The more games played the more accurate the predictions should be.

I am concentrating mainly on Younger under 89 rated players as these are more consistent risers and more profitable, Goal keepers are dealt with by SM in a completely different way, which is why I mostly also ignore Gk's 

Pred-Ever-Burn-Shef-UArsen1.png

Just noticed Callum Chambers is NOT a +1, its a typo should of course be a Zero. We are on the "Home Stretch" now with the Premiership.

Thanks to all for your interest and support of the spreadsheet predictions, much appreciated. Cheers Socca 😀

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Djordjee said:

Who to pick out of:

Gnabry

Havertz

Rashford

Sane?

And also for CB:

Upamecano

Lenglet

J. Gimenez

Skriniar?

Thanks in advance 😁

Havertz/Gnabry

Upamecano

30 minutes ago, The punch said:

i do not agree with you, a lot of quite similar players had increases to 91 ( zakaria, ginter etc ) and M'gladbach is no superior to Wolverhampton. the wolves had a fairly good season (PL and europa) and are now installed in the top 8 PL.

Neves is one of the best midfielder in PL and I'm 100% sure he's going up to 91 

and i would like him to sign for us to replace matic in the future but ole ole wants brooks ... 

M’gladbach are in the UCL next season, they finished 4th much better than Wolves.

Ive said on many occasions he’s a top quality midfielder but I just don’t think he should rise to 91 just yet 🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/23/2020 at 3:37 PM, Id rather be in SW19 said:

532 is proving quite successful for me in one world, looks not dissimilar to the old 352 and allows LB and RB to be wing backs whereas needs to be LM or RM on 352.

Think you're onto something there. Used this in a few gw's last night and beat 4-3-3a, 4-3-3b and 4-2-3-1b.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...