Jump to content

Rahul W's rating predictions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 33.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Sir Rahul

    3522

  • Kieran_S91

    2421

  • Soccahappy

    1334

  • Milanista1

    1231

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi all, As you have seen, I have not really been active over the past few months other than updating my preds. It's just been me phasing out of the forum. Now that the reviews are done, I can say

Just noticed this thread has crossed 1 million views, 23k odd replies, 930 pages.  I know this is 3 and a half years old but I never intended for this to monopolise the forum back then (I would h

Page 200- didn't think we'd get here when I started this casually- thanks all

Posted Images

12 minutes ago, Soccahappy said:

about to call another bluff after "volleyball" deligt and "colander" dejong who is still dreaming muller that rape his cat while laughing on his face. more and more convinced that the reviewers is some yankee assuming that is alike of baseball.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, WillBedford said:

Benjamin Mendy + Barella or Ferland Mendy + Wirtz + E Garcia

Trio for me.

Wirtz is a wonderkid, Garcia could succeed at Barcelona.

3 minutes ago, erdingerpfc said:

Ings 90 yesterday,Jimenez 91 today,and I didn't but any of them although they were on my wish list...with Ilicic 3 fails in bringing good striker 😕

Don’t worry Martial to the rescue if he’s available of course. He should rise from to 90 to 91 🙂

48 minutes ago, Soccahappy said:

Leeds are doing a Fulham and Aston Villa but with a lot of quality and great prospects for the future.

I’m really excited for Leeds this season, with Bielsa at the wheel what can go wrong.... Nothing!

1 hour ago, oronzodd said:

what about dendoncker? puzzling.

Actual joke this 😂

Been superb for Wolves this season, another suspect decision from SM.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Kurt angle said:

Anyone know what the next league to review is? Got to be Russian or Ukranian soon surely?

Hopefully one of those

1 hour ago, Big nasty said:

Have a choice of the following defenders:

Giminez

Sule

Lenglet 

Hummels

Ramos

Kimpembe

Klosterman

Ginter

who are you going for? 

Short term: Ramos or Hummels

Otherwise I might go for Lenglet

Depends what you want

1 hour ago, Soccahappy said:

:D 

1 hour ago, Soccahappy said:

Would be a statement signing if they can pull it off! Bielsa assembling the Rodrigos...

58 minutes ago, Soccahappy said:

Aleksey Miranchuk to Atalanta .... Confirmed Just medical to complete.

Rare to see a young Russian overseas!

45 minutes ago, WillBedford said:

Benjamin Mendy + Barella or Ferland Mendy + Wirtz + E Garcia

Trio

Just now, Ra's al Ghul said:

does anyone know the news of the updates they will make in September in soccer manager? Is there a right date? or what are the changes ...

No clue yet mate

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Big nasty said:

Have a choice of the following defenders:

Giminez

Sule

Lenglet 

Hummels

Ramos

Kimpembe

Klosterman

Ginter

who are you going for? 

Lenglet > Gimenez > Klostermann 

5 hours ago, Troianos77 said:

Oyarzabal, Pepé or Coman? Would you stay with any of these? Or none of them. It could be more than one. They are not my first team pick.

Coman. Sell the rest.

7 hours ago, WillBedford said:

Benjamin Mendy + Barella or Ferland Mendy + Wirtz + E Garcia

Trio if you don't need Barella. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Troianos77 said:

Oyarzabal, Pepé or Coman? Would you stay with any of these? Or none of them. It could be more than one. They are not my first team pick.

I'd stick Coman as others don't seem likely to rise for some time

--

Shon Weissmann has moved to Valladolid, had a great season in Austria, 30 goals in the league. 82 rated only, worth investing.

Might get a bump to 83/84 in the days to come. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, WillBedford said:

Benjamin Mendy + Barella or Ferland Mendy + Wirtz + E Garcia

Trio

 

2 hours ago, Troianos77 said:

Oyarzabal, Pepé or Coman? Would you stay with any of these? Or none of them. It could be more than one. They are not my first team pick.

I would keep all three and see how they start the season which isn't far away. With the reviews done there's nothing to lose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More Final updates for Premiership Review below:-

Previous tables on pages 777, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784.785,786,787, 788, 789, 790, 791,792,793, 794,795,796,797,798,799,800,801,803,804,805.806,807,808,810,811,812,813,814.816,817,818,819,821,822,823,824,825,8826,827,828,829,830,831.832,833,834,835.836,837,839,841,842,844,845,855,856,857.860,864,866, 867.868,871,872,873,875,876,877,878,880,914,955,988. 1003,1008,1016, 1023.1026,1030, 1032,1042, 1045, 1047, 1055 , 1057, 1060, 1063, 1065, 1068, 1082, 1083, 1085, 1087, 1089, 1092, 1095, 1098, 1103,1106,1109,1118 ,1121, 1124 1126, 1132, 1138, 1141, 1147, 1152, 1153, 1155, 1157, 1158  Be careful of the Reddish boxes where the higher rated players are more inclined towards performances rather than stats.

Please click on zoom to 125% or 150% and it's monster size and can be read Immediately. Left hand side of screen disappears entirely, great!

Minutes will vary game by game and league position also helps a lot. Anything over 0% indicates likely riser, higher the better/safer. Negative percentages don't predict a drop just less chances of a rise. The more games played the more accurate the predictions should be.

I am concentrating mainly on Younger under 89 rated players as these are more consistent risers and more profitable, Goal keepers are dealt with by SM in a completely different way, which is why I mostly also ignore Gk's 

Sp-Sht-Predi-Chel-Man-Un1.png

Both these 2 TOP Clubs look interesting, but ManU in particular 

Greenwood: Spreadsheet has predicted another +4 after a +10 this season already.  Is it too much to ask 14 in 1 season?? I could have interceded and changed to +3. I don't usually intercede unless it looks silly. I tend to think forumer's understand it's stats and a complicated formula that tries to work with all scenarios. I think myself +3 to 86 but let's see.

Martial: It's a very high stats figure (RED Boxed) 31.2% and i do think Martial will get his rise as he has struggled to get 91 for a long time.

Brandon Williams: Same story as Greenwood +3 on top of a +12

Maguire: What do u say.  again a high Stats figure  because he played 3420minutes out of 3420! Yet I can't see him getting a 92!! So yes have to say I have interceded and changed it to No Rise, I'm right aren't I?? RED Boxes are stats and SM do it on performances.

Andreas Perreira: Well he SHOULD have got at least a +1 first half of season but has not got enough in 2nd half of season. So Spreadsheet works it from last SM review date, so he's got -17.5% and no rise. Interestingly what will SM do now? Will they see they missed last time and forgive his injuries and give him his rise on the season as a whole?? Interesting what do others think??

Anyway a few points of discussion here and Mctominey and Santos Fred could be judged on the same basis as Andreas too?

But will SM?? 

Thanks to all for your interest and support of the spreadsheet predictions, much appreciated, Cheers Socca 😀

Ps I have a bad feeling I'll get "Hidden" again ☹️ No! Yippeeee! "For the times they are a changing"

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Soccahappy said:

More Final updates for Premiership Review below:-

Previous tables on pages 777, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784.785,786,787, 788, 789, 790, 791,792,793, 794,795,796,797,798,799,800,801,803,804,805.806,807,808,810,811,812,813,814.816,817,818,819,821,822,823,824,825,8826,827,828,829,830,831.832,833,834,835.836,837,839,841,842,844,845,855,856,857.860,864,866, 867.868,871,872,873,875,876,877,878,880,914,955,988. 1003,1008,1016, 1023.1026,1030, 1032,1042, 1045, 1047, 1055 , 1057, 1060, 1063, 1065, 1068, 1082, 1083, 1085, 1087, 1089, 1092, 1095, 1098, 1103,1106,1109,1118 ,1121, 1124 1126, 1132, 1138, 1141, 1147, 1152, 1153, 1155, 1157, 1158  Be careful of the Reddish boxes where the higher rated players are more inclined towards performances rather than stats.

Please click on zoom to 125% or 150% and it's monster size and can be read Immediately. Left hand side of screen disappears entirely, great!

Minutes will vary game by game and league position also helps a lot. Anything over 0% indicates likely riser, higher the better/safer. Negative percentages don't predict a drop just less chances of a rise. The more games played the more accurate the predictions should be.

I am concentrating mainly on Younger under 89 rated players as these are more consistent risers and more profitable, Goal keepers are dealt with by SM in a completely different way, which is why I mostly also ignore Gk's 

Sp-Sht-Predi-Chel-Man-Un1.png

Both these 2 TOP Clubs look interesting, but ManU in particular 

Greenwood: Spreadsheet has predicted another +4 after a +10 this season already.  Is it too much to ask 14 in 1 season?? I could have interceded and changed to +3. I don't usually intercede unless it looks silly. I tend to think forumer's understand it's stats and a complicated formula that tries to work with all scenarios. I think myself +3 to 86 but let's see.

Martial: It's a very high stats figure (RED Boxed) 31.2% and i do think Martial will get his rise as he has struggled to get 91 for a long time.

Brandon Williams: Same story as Greenwood +3 on top of a +12

Maguire: What do u say.  again a high Stats figure  because he played 3420minutes out of 3420! Yet I can't see him getting a 92!! So yes have to say I have interceded and changed it to No Rise, I'm right aren't I?? RED Boxes are stats and SM do it on performances.

Andreas Perreira: Well he SHOULD have got at least a +1 first half of season but has not got enough in 2nd half of season. So Spreadsheet works it from last SM review date, so he's got -17.5% and no rise. Interestingly what will SM do now? Will they see they missed last time and forgive his injuries and give him his rise on the season as a whole?? Interesting what do others think??

Anyway a few points of discussion here and Mctominey and Santos Fred could be judged on the same basis as Andreas too?

But will SM?? 

Thanks to all for your interest and support of the spreadsheet predictions, much appreciated, Cheers Socca 😀

Ps I have a bad feeling I'll get "Hidden" again ☹️

greenwood +5 to 88 100% ! wait and see

Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Nameless said:

Did anybody notice that if you put soft tackling you end up with more yellow cards and give away more fouls?

I once tried it unsuccessfully and yes he was playing aggressively and I got 1 sent off and 2 injuries!

I thought he'd get sendings off, But NO not one!

8 minutes ago, The punch said:

greenwood +5 to 88 100% ! wait and see

That would be a knock out PUNCH!

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/30/2020 at 6:06 PM, JBS said:

Rashica + Kumballa + cash = Tammy Abraham

I want Abraham but price seems high

The trio for me. I've never really rated T. Abraham. He will probably get less playing time next season with T. Werner coming in at Chelsea. 

20 hours ago, José Xavier said:

Is there a possibility that Neymar is 97?

For him to still have a rating of 96 is somewhat questionable. And a  97 anytime soon seems very very unlikely. 

8 hours ago, Marek said:

Samuel Chukwueze or Dani Olmo. Who to keep and why?

D. Olmo is starting to find his feet since the restart. I'm sure he'll improve/play well next season. 

6 hours ago, Big nasty said:

Have a choice of the following defenders:

Giminez

Sule - long term

Lenglet 

Hummels

Ramos - short term

Kimpembe - long term

Klosterman

Ginter

who are you going for? 

I would choose one from the bold. 

5 hours ago, WillBedford said:

Benjamin Mendy + Barella or Ferland Mendy + Wirtz + E Garcia

The duo - but only if they will go straight into your first eleven. Otherwise I'd go for the trio!

4 hours ago, Troianos77 said:

Oyarzabal, Pepé or Coman? Would you stay with any of these? Or none of them. It could be more than one. They are not my first team pick.

Coman is the most likely to have a better rating in the future as he plays for the better side and isn't too bad a player either.

Of course with Sane's signing it will limit his game time, yet if Bayern continue to dominate - with Coman playing some part in it: could be enough to warrant  him a rise next season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, topofthebilly said:

Guys ,

I have a 88 central defender . should i upgrade him to kimpembe (91)

OR

I have a 88 goalkeeper , should i upgrade him to neuer (94) .

 

They are both the same budget (20M) , but what would make most impact for my team ? Can only buy one .

Kimpembe, younger and more likely to upgrade in the future.

Im sure I heard someone say a few pages back about goalkeepers performance not always reflecting their rating.

In short doesn’t matter if you have a 89 rated goalkeeper compared to a 95.

I will try to find the post.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Kierans91 said:

Kimpembe, younger and more likely to upgrade in the future.

Im sure I heard someone say a few pages back about goalkeepers performance not always reflecting their rating.

In short doesn’t matter if you have a 89 rated goalkeeper compared to a 95.

I will try to find the post.

Think it may have been mine Kieran

10 minutes ago, topofthebilly said:

Guys ,

I have a 88 central defender . should i upgrade him to kimpembe (91)

OR

I have a 88 goalkeeper , should i upgrade him to neuer (94) .

 

They are both the same budget (20M) , but what would make most impact for my team ? Can only buy one .

Kimpembe outfield players make a much bigger difference than Gk's. topofthebilly

9 minutes ago, topofthebilly said:

Guys ,

I have a 88 central defender . should i upgrade him to kimpembe (91)

ORI have a 88 goalkeeper , should i upgrade him to neuer (94) .

 

They are both the same budget (20M) , but what would make most impact for my team ? Can only buy one .

Duplicated post sorry. 🥴😵

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...