Jump to content

Rahul W's rating predictions


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Kev said:

Inconsistent in what way?

I think he was pointing the the fact that STERLING and SANE are argued as deserving +1 to 92 (and will likely get it).

If you are saying that B. SILVA also deserves a +1 to 92, you are kind of saying that all three have performed equally well this season and have earned the rise in equal measure. But this is clearly not the case:

 

STERLING: 23 goals, 12 assists

SANE: 14 goals, 17 assists

B. SILVA: 9 goals, 6 assists

 

Don't get me wrong, I think B. SILVA has had an excellent season with the minutes he has been given, but when you look at SANE and STERLING's stats, it is obvious that B. SILVA has not earn't the rise in equal measure (in my opinion).

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 36.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Sir Rahul

    3881

  • Kieran_S91

    2960

  • Soccahappy

    1515

  • Milanista1

    1281

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi all, As you have seen, I have not really been active over the past few months other than updating my preds. It's just been me phasing out of the forum. Now that the reviews are done, I can say

Just noticed this thread has crossed 1 million views, 23k odd replies, 930 pages.  I know this is 3 and a half years old but I never intended for this to monopolise the forum back then (I would h

Page 200- didn't think we'd get here when I started this casually- thanks all

Posted Images

16 minutes ago, BrutBrutBrut said:

I think he was pointing the the fact that STERLING and SANE are argued as deserving +1 to 92 (and will likely get it).

If you are saying that B. SILVA also deserves a +1 to 92, you are kind of saying that all three have performed equally well this season and have earned the rise in equal measure. But this is clearly not the case:

 

STERLING: 23 goals, 12 assists

SANE: 14 goals, 17 assists

B. SILVA: 9 goals, 6 assists

 

Don't get me wrong, I think B. SILVA has had an excellent season with the minutes he has been given, but when you look at SANE and STERLING's stats, it is obvious that B. SILVA has not earn't the rise in equal measure (in my opinion).

Yeah and I agree. I said he had a 50% chance. Sane and Sterling 100%.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BrutBrutBrut said:

I think he was pointing the the fact that STERLING and SANE are argued as deserving +1 to 92 (and will likely get it).

If you are saying that B. SILVA also deserves a +1 to 92, you are kind of saying that all three have performed equally well this season and have earned the rise in equal measure. But this is clearly not the case:

 

STERLING: 23 goals, 12 assists

SANE: 14 goals, 17 assists

B. SILVA: 9 goals, 6 assists

 

Don't get me wrong, I think B. SILVA has had an excellent season with the minutes he has been given, but when you look at SANE and STERLING's stats, it is obvious that B. SILVA has not earn't the rise in equal measure (in my opinion).

It doesn't really work like that though does it.

For example, if SM felt one player were worth 91.6 and another player were worth 92.4, then they would both be given 92. That doesn't mean that they have both performed equally well though. That's why predicting rises is not an exact science.

I think we could all give examples of players who have the same ratings, but who are clearly of different abilities.

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Monolithic said:

It doesn't really work like that though does it.

For example, if SM felt one player were worth 91.6 and another player were worth 92.4, then they would both be given 92. That doesn't mean that they have both performed equally well though. That's why predicting rises is not an exact science.

I think we could all give examples of players who have the same ratings, but who are clearly of different abilities.

 

Well explained cobber

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, SpanishConq said:

How do people feel of Caligiuri (Schalke).

Great season with good stats, I know he's old. Monolithic and Rahul didn't mention a rise, just sounding out last minute opinions from anyone?

I actually think he deserves a rise, and he's only 30 so it's a possibility. Don't know what the squad cap at Schalke is, but it must be over 89. I think there's an outside chance of 90.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Kev said:

I actually think he deserves a rise, and he's only 30 so it's a possibility. Don't know what the squad cap at Schalke is, but it must be over 89. I think there's an outside chance of 90.

I feel the same. Howedes when he was there rose above 90+(won a world cup), and Kolasinac aswell a 90. 

I think he has a shot aswell

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the one Bundesliga club reviewed today? What a joke.

Also, has Ryan Sessegnon actually ever played on the right wing to get the position change or was that an attempt to get him another rating increase despite him having one last month? 

3 hours ago, PraetorianGuard said:

I got an offer to trade Asensio (on my team) for David De Gea. What do you guys think about this trade? Both have pretty bright futures. I have a few other players (Mbappe, Inaki Williams, Rabiot) to fill in for Asensio.

Best keeper on my team is Sergio Rico.

Rico seems to have lost his place in the Sevilla team for the last couple of months but that could change again next season. I'd probably take the trade personally and see if you can get another talent in for Rico.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, SpanishConq said:

How do people feel of Caligiuri (Schalke).

Great season with good stats, I know he's old. Monolithic and Rahul didn't mention a rise, just sounding out last minute opinions from anyone?

A rise wouldn't be undeserved, but we all know how much SM hate those rated 30+... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Kev said:

Yeah and I agree. I said he had a 50% chance. Sane and Sterling 100%.

Yes, that's the point, you give 50% chance for Silva to rise to 92, a rotation player(a very good one) same rate as teammates that are absolute starters and were instrumental in city's season. But give 20% chance of Depay to rise, a starter, Lyon top scorer and has more assists than anyone else in the team.

12 hours ago, Monolithic said:

It doesn't really work like that though does it.

For example, if SM felt one player were worth 91.6 and another player were worth 92.4, then they would both be given 92. That doesn't mean that they have both performed equally well though. That's why predicting rises is not an exact science.

I think we could all give examples of players who have the same ratings, but who are clearly of different abilities.

But it's not the case here, one could even argue that Gabriel Jesus has 50% chance of a rise, because if not for his mid season injury he would be as instrumental as Sterling or Sané, but Silva, not really.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, PraetorianGuard said:

I got an offer to trade Asensio (on my team) for David De Gea. What do you guys think about this trade? Both have pretty bright futures. I have a few other players (Mbappe, Inaki Williams, Rabiot) to fill in for Asensio.

Best keeper on my team is Sergio Rico.

De Gea easily 

20 minutes ago, JAMancini said:

Zinchenko or Loftus-Cheek?

Cheeky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...