Jump to content

Rahul W's rating predictions


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Sir Rahul

    3322

  • Kieran_S91

    2003

  • Milanista1

    1189

  • Soccahappy

    1132

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hi all, As you have seen, I have not really been active over the past few months other than updating my preds. It's just been me phasing out of the forum. Now that the reviews are done, I can say

Just noticed this thread has crossed 1 million views, 23k odd replies, 930 pages.  I know this is 3 and a half years old but I never intended for this to monopolise the forum back then (I would h

Page 200- didn't think we'd get here when I started this casually- thanks all

Posted Images

24 minutes ago, tupac_healy said:

Nothing for Lukaku.....

 

Wow

The chances of him rising were slim, the overall team performance and 16 goals in the premiere league, 6th best goalscorer was a dip from his last years at Everton.

Well, at least Liverpool got a handful of deserved rises and have 93 and 94 rated forwards, and they didn't even have any silverware, i wonder how they got there. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Floodstreet2017 said:

Take the Man Utd goggles off. There is no way he deserved to rise above 92.

Absolute obscene review giving Gabriel Jesus 92 and not Mbappe!! Scandalous from SM

Disagree. Jesus playing in a tougher league has always delivered when played. Compare that to Mbappe who didn't have a season comparable to his first one and stat-padded off Neymar in the first half of the season.

Not to mention how inconsistent he has been in games PSG lacked for creativity vs minnows

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, harsshl said:

Disagree. Jesus playing in a tougher league has always delivered when played. Compare that to Mbappe who didn't have a season comparable to his first one and stat-padded off Neymar in the first half of the season.

Not to mention how inconsistent he has been in games PSG lacked for creativity vs minnows

Absolute nonsense. He’s 19 years old. If he rips it up in the games against the lesser clubs you would then turn around and say he’s only done it against smaller teams. Which is untrue.

Gabriel Jesus was actually injured for a lot of the second half of the season. 

Neymar Cavani and Mbappe. Too big a difference in ratings for me. Even for France he is one of the best players as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Rhysmorgan13579 said:

De gea got 95 (he is great and i wont argue that) with united not really performing great.

Surely oblak has 94 in the bag? Would seem stupid to have them two ratings a part without de gea winning some serious trophies.

Not one player in that united team outperformed de Gea for 3-5 seasons. So he catches the eyes more. With atletico it's griezmann or Costa or Giminez or Saul even Torres gets the headlines. For me it's understandable if the ratings differ but yes they should be on par.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Middle_Finger said:

Not one player in that united team outperformed de Gea for 3-5 seasons. So he catches the eyes more. With atletico it's griezmann or Costa or Giminez or Saul even Torres gets the headlines. For me it's understandable if the ratings differ but yes they should be on par.

I agree he has carried them at times but you could make similar arguments for other teams who have not won much either. I can bare him getting 95 because he is superb but i just dont want oblak over looked for not being as glamorous 

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Rhysmorgan13579 said:

De gea got 95 (he is great and i wont argue that) with united not really performing great.

Surely oblak has 94 in the bag? Would seem stupid to have them two ratings a part without de gea winning some serious trophies.

 

23 minutes ago, Middle_Finger said:

Not one player in that united team outperformed de Gea for 3-5 seasons. So he catches the eyes more. With atletico it's griezmann or Costa or Giminez or Saul even Torres gets the headlines. For me it's understandable if the ratings differ but yes they should be on par.

Oblak has to be 94, arguably the best goalkeeper in the world along with De Gea. Atletico see him as important as Griezmann etc. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, AlfonDaddy said:

His rating change was spot on imo. Any more or any less would have been undeserved

Look,don't want to complain to much but Sterling have some terrific stats, 3.268 min  23 goal and 16 assist and in the game economy he wins PL with a records of points.I have played this game for long long time and in a similar situation another player would have been 93.I can understand who says he have less potential than Sanè or he have these stats thanks to the great player City have or blablabla but the fact is that he is one of the most incisive players in that role

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AlfonDaddy said:

His rating change was spot on imo. Any more or any less would have been undeserved

 

26 minutes ago, El Barto said:

Honestly I'm bit disappointed to see Sterling get only +1

I have Sterling in all my Gw's & have had him since his first game as a kid for Liverpool. I watch him onTv throughout the last few seasons. I wonder if El Barto you have seen him play??

He is so frustrating to watch, blinding pace & a lot of ability but and this is a BIG BUT he is much like Walcott was as a younger break through player.... A Nervous Headless Chicken. He has no composure in front of goals at all & unless he has a close target or has no time to think & acts instinctively striking it first time. A lot of  his goals are laid on for him by such as KDB & David Silva but his conversion rate is very poor, missing so many easy chances from yards out.

Reading my comments above, I may well be being too harsh on a young still learning/ developing player. But he is exasperating at times missing chances my grandma should score. Too harsh again 🙄🙄  but u can understand my underlying message here 92 is definitely enough. Guardiolo has given him a real boost in motivation & he keeps trying and doesn't hide but he has a real problem to overcome to go much higher unless he improves. Rant over (At Sterling not El Barto I mean)

Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, El Barto said:

Honestly I'm bit disappointed to see Sterling get only +1

Wasn't going to happen. I do feel he should have got the +1 to 92 in December though as his stats were insane.

1 hour ago, TMCosta said:

No chance...he is still stuck...bought him only for money...the problem is my Carvajal is injured ;)

95 de Gea...94 Courtois no???

I really dont like Gabriel Jesus at 92

Courtois hasn't been great this season and Chelsea didn't even finish in top four. Provided Oblak goes up to 94 and Alisson and ter Stegen rise I think the goalkeeper ratings are about right with Ederson a bit low at 91 but he started the season 88 rated and isn't the Brazil #1 so a rise from 88 to 92 in one season might be a bit much.

As for Jesus I guess him being a starter for Brazil has helped. I don't think he's played enough to get 92 but can see why they did it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Tharanidharan said:

Yeah. Otamendi was their main man in defence. Should have been rised. 

 

De Gea to 95? Is this because of his promotion in national team to #1 GK? His first World Cup appearance tomorrow. Excited.

De Gea rose solely because of his extraordinary skills and performances as a Goalkeeper. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rhysmorgan13579 said:

De gea got 95 (he is great and i wont argue that) with united not really performing great.

Surely oblak has 94 in the bag? Would seem stupid to have them two ratings a part without de gea winning some serious trophies.

Yup. IMO Oblak, de Gea and ter Stegen are top 3 by a stretch. Will be a shame if the other 2 don't get a +1 as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...