TMCosta 1,887 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 15 minutes ago, Soccahappy said: YES Definitely PORTUGAL (Portimonense) although strangely SWiki is only letting me see the first page, when I click on any other page it doesn't change, but it's definitely Portugal. This may be just a temporary fault OR SM are blocking me (unlikely). Anyone else having this?? No problems here. Portimonense and Paços de Ferreira What about +7 for Maximinano and +4 for Camacho before the review? Isnt that the weirdest thing? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vtrmp 5 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 2 minutos atrás, TMCosta disse: Sem problemas aqui. Portimonense e Paços de Ferreira Que tal +7 para Maximinano e +4 para Camacho antes da revisão? Não é uma coisa mais estranha? @ TMCosta Quais são os jovens jogadores portugueses mais promissores? Tiago Dantas, Fábio Vieira and more?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TMCosta 1,887 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 1 hour ago, vtrmp said: @ TMCosta Quais são os jovens jogadores portugueses mais promissores? Tiago Dantas, Fábio Vieira and more?? Fabio Silva, Fabio Vieira, Vitor Ferreira, Tiago Dantas, Romario Baro, Luis Maximiano, Francisco Trincão, Diogo Costa, Diogo Queirós, Matchoi Djalo, Pedro Gonçalves, Nuno Tavares, David Carmo...and so on Lowco 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
vtrmp 5 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 29 minutes ago, TMCosta said: Fabio Silva, Fabio Vieira, Vitor Ferreira, Tiago Dantas, Romario Baro, Luis Maximiano, Francisco Trincão, Diogo Costa, Diogo Queirós, Matchoi Djalo, Pedro Gonçalves, Nuno Tavares, David Carmo...and so on Toni Martinez sell or keep ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kieran_S91 8,398 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 11 minutes ago, vtrmp said: Toni Martinez sell or keep ? Keep. Should go up in the Portugal review Soccahappy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TMCosta 1,887 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 2 hours ago, vtrmp said: Toni Martinez sell or keep ? 2 hours ago, Kierans91 said: Keep. Should go up in the Portugal review I think he meant after the review. i think he will get a +2...then its up to you but u have to wait a year problably for another raise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
koplfc 8,428 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 Picked up Nicolas Seiwald in a competitive setup - can anyone tell me much about him? TIA Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mattheus 42 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 18 hours ago, Milanista1 said: In défense i have soyuncu lenglet de vrij hummels and in middle i have allan Arthur niguez erikssen Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mattheus 42 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 16 hours ago, Kierans91 said: Firmino - all though it’s depends on how strong you are in other areas. If Veratti and Umtiti strengthen your squad as a whole and would both play first team then I would get the duo. Jorginho Richarlison. Eze. Id keep for the next review and if he’s not moved on to the premier league or 1 of the top 4/5 leagues then I would sell. Am - Coutinho Dm - Veratti but I would be inclined to pick Arthur just because I think he has so much potential and he couldn’t be playing for a much better team with the best player in the world. Just depends on what position you are wanting to strengthen. Coutinho then Veratti/Arthur In défense i have devrij soyuncu lenglet hummels and in middle i have Arthur allan eriksen niguez Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kieran_S91 8,398 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 42 minutes ago, Mickbor59 said: In défense i have devrij soyuncu lenglet hummels and in middle i have Arthur allan eriksen niguez Personally you have a strong midfield and defence so I would go for Richarlison and Firmino up top with Jorginho swap for Allan. Devrij and Hummels are getting on so I would look to invest in some defenders with potential maybe like Gomez or Dayot Upamecano if there available. Or if you’re funds are running a little low maybe Kabak, Badiashile, Ampadu, Kouassi, Todibo, Saliba etc. Also what strikers do you have? Is Firmino a big upgrade to your squad? ombarcagunners, Milanista1 and Mattheus 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Mattheus 42 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 21 minutes ago, Kierans91 said: Personnellement, vous avez un milieu de terrain et une défense solides, donc j'irais pour Richarlison et Firmino en haut avec Jorginho pour Allan. Devrij et Hummels s'entendent donc je chercherais à investir dans certains défenseurs avec un potentiel comme Gomez ou Dayot Upamecano s'ils sont disponibles. Ou si vos fonds sont un peu bas, peut-être Kabak, Badiashile, Ampadu, Kouassi, Todibo, Saliba, etc. Quels grévistes avez-vous également? Firmino est-il une grande mise à niveau de votre équipe? Monde de jeu très compétitif... Mon équipe : becker Walker Danilo de vrij hummels lenglet umtiti soyuncu robertson sandro verratti Arthur allan niguez eriksen del ali aubameyang Gabriel jesus Barbosa everton soares Richarlisson son j'aimerais avoir Firmino (verrati + umtiti) et coutinho (aubameyang) et jorginho (everton soares + demiral +10M) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kieran_S91 8,398 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 20 minutes ago, Mickbor59 said: Monde de jeu très compétitif... Mon équipe : becker Walker Danilo de vrij hummels lenglet umtiti soyuncu robertson sandro verratti Arthur allan niguez eriksen del ali aubameyang Gabriel jesus Barbosa everton soares Richarlisson son j'aimerais avoir Firmino (verrati + umtiti) et coutinho (aubameyang) et jorginho (everton soares + demiral +10M) I’d keep Auba (best striker in the premier league in my opinion) stats don’t lie and he’s playing in a team that has done great for the last few seasons. For that reason I wouldn’t get Firmino and would go for the duo in Veratti and umtiti. You have son and Jesus who are also 2 great strikers. keep Jorginho. Mattheus 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Soccahappy 9,320 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 Latest part Update for Portugal (in Swiki now!) Below with also some updates from Rennes and Lille etc:- Remember this is my first spreadsheet predictions for Portugal so the accuracy is unlikely to be as good as BIG5 predictions. I have to find SM's 0%Line and adjust for the next review. Hopefully my estimation, won't be critically out this first time. Previous tables on pages 777, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784.785,786,787, 788, 789, 790, 791,792,793, 794,795,796,797,798,799,800,801,803,804,805.806,807,808,810,811,812,813,814.816,817,818,819,821,822,823,824,825,826,827,828,829,830,831.832,833,834,835.836,837,839,841,842,844,845,855,856,857.860,864,866, 867.868,871 872 Be careful of the Reddish boxes where the higher rated players are more inclined towards performances rather than stats. Minutes will vary game by game and league position also helps a lot. Anything over 0% indicates likely riser, higher the better/safer. Negative percentages don't predict a drop just less chances of a rise. The more games played the more accurate the predictions should be. I am concentrating mainly on Younger under 89 rated players as these are more consistent risers and more profitable, Goal keepers are dealt with by SM in a completely different way, which is why I mostly also ignore Gk's Sorry in my haste to finish b4 6pm I forgot to put Lille in the proper order. BTW I'm surprised Renato Sanches has at last found some kind of form, to be selected consistently and play enough to get a rise (But it is still a "Red Box"). That is all I'm doing for portugal and I hope I get near the SMzero percentage line. My guess last week of Swiki starting Portugal on Tuesday turned out to be correct. Thanks again for the interest and support, Cheers Socca Ps Edit: To TMCosta SM do what u could call a "taking the cream off the top b4 we know it's starting". Just makes it harder to buy good risers as soon as a country's review is started which I used to do a lot of in the past. I have near the Max in all my squads now tho already..... 255 players! TMCosta, Djordjee and Liverp00l 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TMCosta 1,887 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 14 minutes ago, Soccahappy said: Edit: To TMCosta SM do what u could call a "taking the cream off the top b4 we know it's starting". Just makes it harder to buy good risers as soon as a country's review is started which I used to do a lot of in the past. I have near the Max in all my squads now tho already..... 255 players! Yep i understand what they want but not funny 😕 Soccahappy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Milanista1 2,046 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 12 hours ago, errrrerrre said: Pick one: M. Artur, Dybala. Dybala is higher rated, and performing better this season. Pick one: F.Ruiz/Odeegard, M.Savic. F.Ruiz is a well rated player, although Ode has the potential to reach up to his level (and more) in the latter future. The players are all of different positions? Therefore, could you please confirm are you buying or selling one out of each of them? 5 hours ago, Mickbor59 said: In défense i have soyuncu lenglet de vrij hummels and in middle i have allan Arthur niguez erikssen From reading your other responses it's clear that you have a well rounded team. Therefore I agree with Kierans91, in that the duo is the better option for you - because you must also consider injuries/suspensions to your other player's. Having the addition of 2 more players would certainly help you out in that regard. Mattheus and Kieran_S91 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hoochy koochy 257 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 2 hours ago, Soccahappy said: Latest part Update for Portugal (in Swiki now!) Below with also some updates from Rennes and Lille etc:- Remember this is my first spreadsheet predictions for Portugal so the accuracy is unlikely to be as good as BIG5 predictions. I have to find SM's 0%Line and adjust for the next review. Hopefully my estimation, won't be critically out this first time. Previous tables on pages 777, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784.785,786,787, 788, 789, 790, 791,792,793, 794,795,796,797,798,799,800,801,803,804,805.806,807,808,810,811,812,813,814.816,817,818,819,821,822,823,824,825,826,827,828,829,830,831.832,833,834,835.836,837,839,841,842,844,845,855,856,857.860,864,866, 867.868,871 872 Be careful of the Reddish boxes where the higher rated players are more inclined towards performances rather than stats. Minutes will vary game by game and league position also helps a lot. Anything over 0% indicates likely riser, higher the better/safer. Negative percentages don't predict a drop just less chances of a rise. The more games played the more accurate the predictions should be. I am concentrating mainly on Younger under 89 rated players as these are more consistent risers and more profitable, Goal keepers are dealt with by SM in a completely different way, which is why I mostly also ignore Gk's Sorry in my haste to finish b4 6pm I forgot to put Lille in the proper order. BTW I'm surprised Renato Sanches has at last found some kind of form, to be selected consistently and play enough to get a rise (But it is still a "Red Box"). That is all I'm doing for portugal and I hope I get near the SMzero percentage line. My guess last week of Swiki starting Portugal on Tuesday turned out to be correct. Thanks again for the interest and support, Cheers Socca Ps Edit: To TMCosta SM do what u could call a "taking the cream off the top b4 we know it's starting". Just makes it harder to buy good risers as soon as a country's review is started which I used to do a lot of in the past. I have near the Max in all my squads now tho already..... 255 players! Hey Socca. It would be refreshing if you could do a post again explaining the colours. Why are some green. Why some purple. Red clearly depicts risk. Thanks Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ombarcagunners 739 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 Upamecano should be 91 hoochy koochy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Soccahappy 9,320 Posted March 10, 2020 Report Share Posted March 10, 2020 41 minutes ago, hoochy koochy said: Hey Socca. It would be refreshing if you could do a post again explaining the colours. Why are some green. Why some purple. Red clearly depicts risk. Thanks The colours are really just decorative hooch.The power is in the percentage figure and the colours to help you focus on the percentage itself. Imagine if it was just black and white, much harder to get a feel of the percentage even in Bold:- I glaze over looking at the blank illustration above but just look how the red 3rd stands out... So the decoration is just something I add so u can easily see either side of where the 0% line is. The colour should after you've seen as many as u have now, just draw your eye to what your looking for. If it's close 10% in either direction then pale green, negative % with a red font and up to 10% positive % a black font. Both have a chance but that's a 20% Gap. +10% to 50% is a Bright Green and above 50% a spectacular Bright Yellow. Simples! But it's the percentage itself that matters Hooch. Yes the red boxes are risk as u say and if it's a paler red, purple etc. not quite as risky. But it's just my opinion Pavard I think deserves it but SM didn't think so. Ignore Lille because I didn't put them in descending order. I tried to be "refreshing" hooch but maybe leaving my reply at "The colours are really just decorative hooch" would have been themost refreshing. But why use a few words when u can bore people to death as most Nerds like me do🥴😀 TMCosta, Kieran_S91, Liverp00l and 1 other 2 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hoochy koochy 257 Posted March 11, 2020 Report Share Posted March 11, 2020 2 hours ago, Soccahappy said: The colours are really just decorative hooch.The power is in the percentage figure and the colours to help you focus on the percentage itself. Imagine if it was just black and white, much harder to get a feel of the percentage even in Bold:- I glaze over looking at the blank illustration above but just look how the red 3rd stands out... So the decoration is just something I add so u can easily see either side of where the 0% line is. The colour should after you've seen as many as u have now, just draw your eye to what your looking for. If it's close 10% in either direction then pale green, negative % with a red font and up to 10% positive % a black font. Both have a chance but that's a 20% Gap. +10% to 50% is a Bright Green and above 50% a spectacular Bright Yellow. Simples! But it's the percentage itself that matters Hooch. Yes the red boxes are risk as u say and if it's a paler red, purple etc. not quite as risky. But it's just my opinion Pavard I think deserves it but SM didn't think so. Ignore Lille because I didn't put them in descending order. I tried to be "refreshing" hooch but maybe leaving my reply at "The colours are really just decorative hooch" would have been themost refreshing. But why use a few words when u can bore people to death as most Nerds like me do🥴😀 Thx. Useful and informative for nerds like me taking interest too lol. Real confusion was the colours in “to” box. Soccahappy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Juande14 25 Posted March 11, 2020 Report Share Posted March 11, 2020 11 hours ago, ombarcagunners said: Upamecano should be 91 Wonder if Leipzig will get a rise like Ajax did? Sabitzer +1? ombarcagunners and oronzodd 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TMCosta 1,887 Posted March 11, 2020 Report Share Posted March 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Juande14 said: Wonder if Leipzig will get a rise like Ajax did? Sabitzer +1? Leipzig? or Atalanta? oronzodd 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
oronzodd 101 Posted March 11, 2020 Report Share Posted March 11, 2020 they both deserve i guess, but they are not important like ajax........ Soccahappy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kieran_S91 8,398 Posted March 11, 2020 Report Share Posted March 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Juande14 said: Wonder if Leipzig will get a rise like Ajax did? Sabitzer +1? 25 minutes ago, TMCosta said: Leipzig? or Atalanta? 1 minute ago, oronzodd said: they both deserve i guess, but they are not important like ajax........ I would presume they would need to get little further in the champions league. Semi finals like Ajax did. Milanista1 and TMCosta 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Islelovesoccer 137 Posted March 11, 2020 Report Share Posted March 11, 2020 Kyle Walker deserve GK position added on SM. oronzodd, Elizeu Campos, TMCosta and 1 other 1 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Rahul 7,782 Posted March 11, 2020 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2020 18 hours ago, Soccahappy said: Latest part Update for Portugal (in Swiki now!) Below with also some updates from Rennes and Lille etc:- Remember this is my first spreadsheet predictions for Portugal so the accuracy is unlikely to be as good as BIG5 predictions. I have to find SM's 0%Line and adjust for the next review. Hopefully my estimation, won't be critically out this first time. Previous tables on pages 777, 779, 780, 781, 782, 783, 784.785,786,787, 788, 789, 790, 791,792,793, 794,795,796,797,798,799,800,801,803,804,805.806,807,808,810,811,812,813,814.816,817,818,819,821,822,823,824,825,826,827,828,829,830,831.832,833,834,835.836,837,839,841,842,844,845,855,856,857.860,864,866, 867.868,871 872 Be careful of the Reddish boxes where the higher rated players are more inclined towards performances rather than stats. Minutes will vary game by game and league position also helps a lot. Anything over 0% indicates likely riser, higher the better/safer. Negative percentages don't predict a drop just less chances of a rise. The more games played the more accurate the predictions should be. I am concentrating mainly on Younger under 89 rated players as these are more consistent risers and more profitable, Goal keepers are dealt with by SM in a completely different way, which is why I mostly also ignore Gk's Sorry in my haste to finish b4 6pm I forgot to put Lille in the proper order. BTW I'm surprised Renato Sanches has at last found some kind of form, to be selected consistently and play enough to get a rise (But it is still a "Red Box"). That is all I'm doing for portugal and I hope I get near the SMzero percentage line. My guess last week of Swiki starting Portugal on Tuesday turned out to be correct. Thanks again for the interest and support, Cheers Socca Ps Edit: To TMCosta SM do what u could call a "taking the cream off the top b4 we know it's starting". Just makes it harder to buy good risers as soon as a country's review is started which I used to do a lot of in the past. I have near the Max in all my squads now tho already..... 255 players! I think Renato has finally justified his 88, since he got it, he has had 2.5 seasons where an older player would have dropped. I think it's too soon to give him an 89. TMCosta 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.