Jump to content

variation of the unmanaged club transfer ban idea


Recommended Posts

hey i was thinking and got a good idea:

1. the first would be about unmanaged clubs and their 48-hour transfer ban.

normally when members go "like vultures" for the unmanaged players, they go for the 90+ players, or high rated under 21's.

however while the transfer ban is effective to protect the new manager and his team, it's unfair to othe managers of smaller clubs who have a genuine interest for 89, 88, 87, maybe 86 or 85 rated players. by the time the new manager is in the club, the smaller- club managers may miss the chance to buy a suitable player for their squad.

that's why im saying that instead of a 48-hour ban on transfering from unmanaged clubs, there should an UNLIMITED ban on 90+ players of unmanaged clubs, and the same for 85+ u21 players.

but for the other players, no ban at all.

what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: variation of the unmanaged club transfer ban idea

That would be almost the same as the 'no buying from unmanaged clubs' rule in custom setups.

Personally' date=' i find that it's a good idea. Why not impose the 'no buying from unmanaged clubs' rule in all standard setups?

cheers[/quote']

It's unrealistic IMO in real life even if a club is unmanaged the BOD and chairman still sell players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: variation of the unmanaged club transfer ban idea

hey i was thinking and got a good idea:

1. the first would be about unmanaged clubs and their 48-hour transfer ban.

normally when members go "like vultures" for the unmanaged players' date=' they go for the 90+ players, or high rated under 21's.

however while the transfer ban is effective to protect the new manager and his team, it's unfair to othe managers of smaller clubs who have a genuine interest for 89, 88, 87, maybe 86 or 85 rated players. by the time the new manager is in the club, the smaller- club managers may miss the chance to buy a suitable player for their squad.

that's why im saying that instead of a 48-hour ban on transfering from unmanaged clubs, there should an UNLIMITED ban on 90+ players of unmanaged clubs, and the same for 85+ u21 players.

but for the other players, no ban at all.

what do you think?[/quote']

i don't think it's a good idea. What if the best player in an unmanaged club is 88 or 89. I think 48-hour ban is as good as it is now. It's doing its job, protecting unmanaged clubs at least for 48 hours and thus attracting more potential managers :)

fadedwolfz, i think it's a good idea but i think it's not realistic and practical. That means there would be very few transfer activity in most of the setups :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...