Nuigit 13 Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Why hasn't he risen yet??? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seftinho 4,344 Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? If he hasn't risen yet, he's not going to rise. Really deserved 91 IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Kensational 9,770 Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? If he hasn't risen yet' date=' he's not going to rise.Really deserved 91 IMO. [/quote'] *Rose This came to me as a shock as well, especially since Mandanda rose. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nuigit 13 Posted March 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? *Rose This came to me as a shock as well' date=' especially since Mandanda rose. [/quote'] I was stuck between using risen/rose as well I have both and should I sell either of them now? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seftinho 4,344 Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? *Rose This came to me as a shock as well' date=' especially since Mandanda rose. [/quote'] Haha, risen has always sounded right to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DanW 439 Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? I had sent a ticket off and was pleasently surprised that SM had for once the courtesy to offer me an explanation on why he hadn't rose. I can't remember the reply in full but it was basically: Hi Dan, After looking at everything you have explained why have decided not to give lloris a rise. Our researchers (Some of them french) have decided that he is not yet worthy of a rise to 91, this must just be a case of you rating him slightly higher than our researchers. SM I must admit just recieving a response alone has made the whole experience a little less bad tasting... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LinkinP 1,993 Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? I had sent a ticket off and was pleasently surprised that SM had for once the courtesy to offer me an explanation on why he hadn't rose.I can't remember the reply in full but it was basically: Hi Dan' date=' After looking at everything you have explained why have decided not to give lloris a rise. Our researchers (Some of them french) have decided that he is not yet worthy of a rise to 91, this must just be a case of you rating him slightly higher than our researchers. SM I must admit just recieving a response alone has made the whole experience a little less bad tasting... [/quote'] I thought Cavenaghi was expected to rise as well? Edit: Does anyone know if Fernando (the Bordeux CM) decreased because of injury or if he just hasn't played? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Philippe Nguyen 2,965 Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? Mandanda is favored over Lloris in the French national squad. He is a great keeper, but a lot of Lyon's defensive excellence comes from their defense. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
alexmj 19 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? *Rose This came to me as a shock as well' date=' especially since Mandanda rose. [/quote'] Wrong. Haha' date=' risen has always sounded right to me. [/quote']It is right because you used 'hasn't' in front of it. The sun rose. The sun has risen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Football8 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? Wrong.It is right because you used 'hasn't' in front of it. The sun rose. The sun has risen. Risen is like the present tense, but rose is like the past tense. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Philippe Nguyen 2,965 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? Sigh... Have no fear, the Grammar King is here! "Risen" is the past and future participle form of "rise", used after one or more auxiliary verbs, but not without "have" or any conjugated form of the "have" auxiliary verb. For example, you may say the following: I have risen; I will have risen; I had risen; I have been risen; I could have risen; etc. However, the following are incorrect, as there is no "have" or any conjugation of "have" preceding "risen" in each phrase: I risen; I been risen; I will risen; I should risen; etc. "Rose" is the past form of "rise", used without any auxiliary verb preceding it. For example, you the following are grammatically correct: I rose; he rose; we rose; etc. These, however, are not: I am rose; you are rose; I have rose; he has rose; etc. Therefore, as Seft used a conjugation of "have" (hasn't) before "risen", he is correct. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nuigit 13 Posted March 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? So I was right This is turning from SoccerManager to WordCoach Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tebthereb 3,129 Posted March 22, 2009 Report Share Posted March 22, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? I think Lloris, like much of the Lyon side, suffered largely due to the timing of some poor Lyon form coinciding with the French rating review. The fact that they hadn't won a game in their last 6 matches in all comps, which saw them lose their lead in Ligue 1, and were crushed recently by Barcelona in Europe will have been a big factor in SM's treatment of Lyon in general. Looking at the UEFA team coefficients also doesn't paint a nice picture for Lyon: http://www.xs4all.nl/~kassiesa/bert/uefa/data/method4/tcoef2009.html I would apologise for any grammatical or spelling errors in the above, but I will not. As I don't care. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Gorman 13 Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 Re: No rise for Hugo Lloris? yea,that was intresting.hes playing so well in goal for Lyon and hes only 20.chek and buffon should both be decreased by 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.