Jump to content

Uros Cosic - 'Bigger than Vidic'


Recommended Posts

Re: Uros Cosic - 'Bigger than Vidic'

this thread will be interesting' date='but for 10 years,long way before he reach 90 and 96....................is long distance future for him[/quote']

10 years for reaching 90? No, 10 years for 96 is right, but 90 can be in 2/3 years mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Uros Cosic - 'Bigger than Vidic'

How much have you seen him play? Tell us how good he is!! 90 in 2/3 years is a very bold statement to make.

I don't have seen him play, but one of my friends does. He says that Cosic is really good. From his stories, I can conclude that Cosic is really good, but like you said: 90 is 2/3 years is very unlikely, let's say 4-6 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Re: Uros Cosic - 'Bigger than Vidic'

Does anyone know if he is a regular starter? Next rating change?

http://www.soccerway.com/players/uros-cosic/95744/

Just over 400 minutes so should go up at least +3/4 by now. Though before he'll be updated I guess he'll be somewhere near 800 minutes which would mean +5/6 or so?

He'll rise when the update's there, that's for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Uros Cosic - 'Bigger than Vidic'

Cosic is also currently being targeted by Manchester United!!! Check this link below for further information.

http://www.goal.com/en/news/9/england/2009/12/16/1690536/manchester-united-target-cska-moscow-defender-uros-cosic

"I must stress that we would like to keep Cosic' date='" said CSKA president Yevgeni Giner.

"We even offered him Russian citizenship. It now depends upon the President Medvedev whether it is granted or not.[/quote']

Lol, in Russia citizenship gets you :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Uros Cosic - 'Bigger than Vidic'

Cosic is also currently being targeted by Manchester United!!! Check this link below for further information.

http://www.goal.com/en/news/9/england/2009/12/16/1690536/manchester-united-target-cska-moscow-defender-uros-cosic

Well I think you had to control the date before writing CURRENTLY.......this article was written on December 2009 :eek::eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...