marty111 Posted November 10, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 10, 2012 Re: SPL risers What is happening with Cammy Smith? He'll probably get +2. Pretty dissapointing so far- MacKay Steven +5 is very dissapointing. Russel got his rise though. IIR 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doonhamer Posted November 10, 2012 Report Share Posted November 10, 2012 Re: SPL risers Did it take them 5 mins to complete the first review of Scottish ratings? It looks like they've just guessed most of them! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFC Chewis Posted November 10, 2012 Report Share Posted November 10, 2012 Re: SPL risers These changes some up why SM is losing members and why I no longer play it ridiculous Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frisky Posted November 10, 2012 Report Share Posted November 10, 2012 Re: SPL risers Gary Mackay-Steven worth keeping? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marty111 Posted November 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 11, 2012 Re: SPL risers Gary Mackay-Steven worth keeping? If he can stay injury free then he should reach 83 while still at United. I cant see him staying much longer though so it would depend on where he goes. frisky 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doonhamer Posted November 12, 2012 Report Share Posted November 12, 2012 Re: SPL risers These changes some up why SM is losing members and why I no longer play it ridiculous Agree, and to think i pay money to SM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taylor8 Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 Re: SPL risers Wonder what the Ryan Fraser will get:D Edit just seen 78, joke! One of the best Scottish talents for a long while, and ive seen a few come and go! But thats SM's ratings for you! Agree Watt should be over 80 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doonhamer Posted November 13, 2012 Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 Re: SPL risers Danny Racchi is getting minutes for Killie yet he only rised to a terrible 75. There's players in the first, second and third division rated higher. Absolute joke SM... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marty111 Posted November 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 13, 2012 Re: SPL risers Wonder what the Ryan Fraser will get:DEdit just seen 78' date=' joke! One of the best Scottish talents for a long while, and ive seen a few come and go! But thats SM's ratings for you! Agree Watt should be over 80[/quote'] I agree about Fraser. He should really be getting 80 but if Patterson only got 77 then I'd say Fraser will probably get the same unfortunatley. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vinnydesalvo Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers Fraser only +2 and no change for Watt? Baffling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solarized Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers Wanyama no change. Surely a joke? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenn Hysén Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers Fraser only +2 and no change for Watt? Baffling. The scottish ratings weren't very generous to put it mildly... But to keep Watt on 72 is an absolute joke! +500 mins and 5 goals in liga, 160 mins in scottish cup and a few mins + goalscoring in CHL for the best scottish team (I know they're second in table atm) In my book that justifies a rise to 80. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigtunna Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers No rise for Hooper or Wanyama, are they finished or will they rise tomorrow? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SM Tony Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers Wanyama no change.Surely a joke? Your joking? he did not rise? what a joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers The scottish ratings weren't very generous to put it mildly... But to keep Watt on 72 is an absolute joke! +500 mins and 5 goals in liga' date=' 160 mins in scottish cup and a few mins + goalscoring in CHL for the best scottish team (I know they're second in table atm) In my book that justifies a rise to 80.[/quote'] Ye and Wanyama nor rise, and Kayal drop :eek: what??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers Well, Uruguay is still on the 'next leagues' tab, so that suggests that Scotland still isn't done, there's simply no way Watt can remain 72. Andre Blackman only has 148 SPL minutes for Celtic and he rose to 73, so for him to be ahead of Watt would be shocking. At the absolute least he has to be rised to the minimum of 75, but of course should be getting to 78, going on the other changes they've made. Gary Warren has played every minute this season for an on-form Inverness and his rise today was 67 - 75, so I think we can see now how the SPL is viewed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plankton Pete Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers Suspect there are more changes to come. Keep the faith ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soccahappy Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers Suspect there are more changes to come. Keep the faith ;-) Just SM dragging their feet with reviews, "no change there" ... excuse the pun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunastorta Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Riferimento: SPL risers Valutations are too slow. Slow, slow, slow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hayden19 Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers Wait wanyama (apparently celtic's most valued player) didn't rise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soccahappy Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers Wait wanyama (apparently celtic's most valued player) didn't rise As we are saying, SM dragging their feet with ratings ..... Celtic not done yet .... surely a Joke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doonhamer Posted November 14, 2012 Report Share Posted November 14, 2012 Re: SPL risers What has Izaguirre done to warrant a rise to 87? He's been very mediocre since his return from injury and is in no way better than Mulgrew or Lustig and is even on par with Mathews. Scott Brown shouldn't be an 88! 86 is more realistic. Wanyama and Watt are surely still to be looked at, SURELY! Gary Mackay-Steven only gets a rise to 80 and Leigh Griffiths gets a rise to 82! Paul Cairney has played every game for a top of the league Hibs side and only reaches 78.... hmmmm You drunk SM? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taylor8 Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 Re: SPL risers Efe AMBROSE got a +4:) Victor WANYAMA +4;) Watt to an 80! So why didnt Fraser:confused: Fraser is just as good not impressed SM:( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 Re: SPL risers Watt to an 80! So why didnt Fraser:confused: Fraser is just as good not impressed SM:( Because Celtic are a step above all the other SPL team (he's scored in the Champions League for one thing), their players, rightly, get rated higher. I was only expecting 78 for him, but I'm still not surprised he's got 80. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taylor8 Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 Re: SPL risers Because Celtic are a step above all the other SPL team (he's scored in the Champions League for one thing)' date=' their players, rightly, get rated higher. I was only expecting 78 for him, but I'm still not surprised he's got 80.[/quote']I dont disagree, but we will see on Satuarday who the top club in scotland is! but as ive seen both players in person quiet a few times id say Watt and Fraser deserved 80s Fraser has been SPl young player of the year 3 times so far this season.....watt.......0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.